CROSS POSTED FROM: http://absolutezerounited.blogspot.com/2008/03/common-thread.html
Saturday, March 15, 2008
The Common Thread
Once upon a time Jan Kruska wrote about what she felt the common thread was among children murdered by sexual deviants.
She believes it is because their parents are human and less than perfect.
Unlike her of course.
We've had a lot of things to say about that. I'm sure we'll have a lot more things to say in the future. But for today we're going to talk about a common thread and ask once again Who are these men?
These men that we've talked about (and occasionally women) have some very basic similarities. One of which is to claim that THEY aren't dangerous. It's not THEM. Their crimes should be exempt. Sure, they will admit that there are indeed people who do harm to children. They just deny that it's them. "Well sure, I did it", they'll say, followed quickly by "But it was just a mistake". Of course they would never, ever do it again because didn't you know that a DOJ recidivism study done over a period of 3 years PROVES that sex offenders don't have high recidivism rates?
Let's look at a few of these men closer. Here we have Johnny Ray Lee. He claimed that "statistically speaking, you as a parent are more likely to molest your own child than a registered sex offender is". Johnny said that very thing to a stranger at a buffet bar. It was part of his activism, you see. Of course, he also said "As a diagnosed pedophile who was chemically castrated, I can assure you it doesn't work. In order to stop a pedophile from re-offending you would also have to cut out his brains, cut off his tongue and cut off his hands."
That was a member of Sosen and Roar for Freedom, and also an avid supporter of SOclear and SOhopeful. He just received a 35 year prison sentence.
And what have we here? Why it's Christopher Smithson aka "Slavetoboys", the most recent pedohead to fall and the first conviction attributable to the Wikisposure project. Chris just received 6 years in prison.
You see, Christopher liked to write "fictional" accounts of having sex with children. It turns out that, well - it wasn't fictional. Chris wrote:
"if a child 4-17 wonts to have any type of sex with any type of person, it should be against the law to stop them"
How is that statement different from the Reform Sex Offender Laws petition which calls for abolishment of age of consent laws? The petition which was signed by NAMBLA members along with members of:
SOclear
SOhopeful
SOSEN
Roar for Freedom
Operation Awareness
Some of those people include:
Linda Pehrson
Jan Kruska (RSO)
Lee Lee Lawless
Amanda Rogers (nonexistent person)
Lois Paul
Amanda Meeker
Jacqueline Horst
Margaret Jenkins
Betty Price
Jackie Sparling
C. David Hess (RSO)
Betty Schneider
Linda Tauer
Among others.
Yes they all believe there should be no age of consent laws. Apparently they are ok with 4 year olds being sexually exploited. Yes, they want them to be able to make their own decisions regarding sex, you see. I'm not putting words in their mouths. Oh no. THEY are the ones who signed it.
Here we have another man we recently talked about. Jim Freeman, who was running an international pedophile ring and directly responsible for the sexual abuse of an untold number of children, 40 of which have been rescued as a result of Operation Achilles.
Jim Freeman was the c0-founder along with Tom Madison of SOhopeful. An organization presenting itself as a support network for RSO's and their loved ones, but whose primary goal was to abolish the punishments, penalties and restrictions that apply to those who sexually violate others.
How do Jim Freeman, Johnny Ray Lee and Christopher Smithson differ? They don't. They are all pedophiles. They were all 3 involved in the exploitation and sexual abuse of children.
All 3 are repeat sex offenders.
The Department of Justice reports a low recidivism rate over a period of 3 years post release from prison for new sex crimes. Longer, more thorough studies done over periods of up to 15-30 years reveal a much higher rate, with an average of 25% and some reports going as high as 60-70% for NEW sex crimes.
Even Sarah Tofte of the Human Rights Watch says that 25% of all sex offenders will reoffend within only 15 years. Sarah said she found that statistic striking. She uses that statistic to claim that RSO's aren't a danger to society.
I find that idiotic conclusion striking.
Currently in the state of Georgia, a state considered to have some of the strictest sex offender laws in the nation, out of over 15,000 RSO's there are only 39 registered sex offenders under the age of 20.
I find that statistic striking.
Four months ago in the state of Georgia there were only 70 RSO's under the age of 20.
I find that statistic striking.
The fact is that RSO activists are using teen issues to further their cause. They couldn't care less if same aged teenagers are allowed to legally have sex with each other. No, what these people want is to be able to have sex with these children themselves. Look at their histories, and look at their crimes.
I believe you too, will find it striking.
I suggest remaining vigilant. Keep your eyes and ears open to pedospeak and pedologic. Watch for media spin, watch for unethical journalists calling a CSA victim someone's "lover". Watch for those who call prostituted children "child prostitutes". And absolutely watch for those who victimize children and then refer to themselves as the "true victims" and the actual victim as a "professional victim who refuses to take responsibility for being abused"
Watch for people like Michael Gregg aka ZMan! who claims the little girl he exposed himself to should be jailed....and watch when Betty Price concurs.
Watch for someone claiming we do teenagers a disservice because in 1850 it was common to get married immediately after puberty....completely overlooking the fact that in 1850 -- slavery was legal, women could not vote, disease was rampant and the life expectancy was 39 years.. What significance does the AOC in 1850, 1620, 939 or 55 BC have to do with 2008? I sort of have a feeling that cave men didn't even HAVE an AOC of any sort, does that mean we should act like Neanderthals?
Watch for someone who claims our society is sexually repressed because the age of consent is only 9 in Yemen. Completely overlooking the fact that women in Yemen are beaten and battered into submission. Legally. Completely overlooking the fact that 96% of women in Yemen are sexually controlled by forced female genital mutilation.
Watch for someone who defends an 18 year old for having sex with a 14 year old, then when asked the question "Would you have done it if she had been 12?" the response being "Oh NO, absolutely not, there must be a 'line' somewhere" Completely overlooking the fact that there WAS a line and it was crossed.
All those things are known as spin. Those are things you need to watch out for. Spin is an unethical manipulation of factual information to make something appear to mean something that in reality it does not mean.
Spin is evil.
Spin is enabling behavior.
The Antis won't stand for it.
Labels: AOC, Betty Price, Child Pornography, Jan Kruska, Jim Freeman, Johnny Ray Lee, Linda Pehrson, NAMBLA, pedophiles, Pedospeak, Roar4Freedom, Sarah Tofte, SoClear, SoHopeful, SOSEN, Wikisposure, Zman
Stitches77 posted
Showing posts with label SOSEN. Show all posts
Showing posts with label SOSEN. Show all posts
Saturday, March 15, 2008
Friday, March 7, 2008
Child porn suspect wanted reform ~ Obligations and Boundaries
Child Porn Suspect, James Freeman.
http://www.nwfdailynews.com/article/12657/1
Child porn suspect wanted reform
James Freeman was co-founder of a group for changing sex offender tracking laws
Andrew Gant
Friday March 7th, 2008
SANTA ROSA BEACH — Before he was indicted in a global child porn ring, James Freeman was a registered sex offender leading a campaign to reform Megan's Law.
"It is illogical to present a system that tracks non-violent, one-crime one-victim, lowest-risk sex offenders as a benefit to public safety," reads a statement at SOhopeful.org, where Freeman was listed as executive director until his indictment Tuesday.
The group emphasizes it does not excuse sex offenses or abuse. With the 47-year-old Freeman indicted on a slew of federal child porn charges, his name has been erased from the Web site. SOhopeful's executive director position was listed as "unfilled" Friday.
Phone calls and e-mails to Carolyn Ferguson, a SOhopeful representative, were unanswered Friday. Meanwhile, a message posted on the group's public Web forum said members were "horrified and disheartened" and Freeman was removed from the organization.
"The Board of Directors is addressing internal structure and security issues," the message explained.
A message board for another sex offender law reform group — Reform Organization Attitude Restoration (ROAR) — contains posts from users who acknowledge the connection, but apparently had hoped to keep it secret.
"I think by now most of you know about the horrible story of Mystic of SOhopeful being charged in a large disgusting peodphile (sic) ring," writes one user. "I can only pray that this is some kind of misunderstanding or government 'fix.' "
Freeman's user name in the enterprise was "Mystikal," according to the 35-count indictment.
"… NO press release should be made unless the media picks up on a connection between Jim and Sohopefull (sic) and a big deal is being made of it first," the ROAR user writes.
SOhopeful's message was posted at 3 p.m. Friday, a day after The Daily News called for information.
Freeman was found guilty in March 1997 for lewd and lascivious acts with a 16-year-old in Georgia.
His registered address is 821 N. Church St. in Santa Rosa Beach.
SOhopeful International was established in 1999 to support changes in sex offender registration requirements, according to its Web site. Its materials claim existing legislation vilifies harmless offenders and floods a system that should track only dangerous predators.
A grand jury Tuesday decided Freeman and 11 others should stand trial on a number of federal charges: engaging in a child exploitation enterprise; conspiracy; advertisement of child pornography; transportation of child pornography; receipt of child pornography; and obstruction of justice.
Prosecutors say the men used vast file-sharing networks to use child porn as Internet currency and trade more than 400,000 images and videos of child sex abuse.
The indictment alleges Freeman shared at least two folders of child porn and then thanked the others for participating in the long-running enterprise.
"My thanks to you and all the others that together make this the greatest group of pedos to ever gather in one place," he wrote, according to the indictment. "I'm honored just to be a part of it."
Other users added their own files, including one who advertised videos of girls under 10 years old who were "heavily drugged" and abused.
If convicted, Freeman and the others each face 20 years to life in prison plus fines.
Some of the men also have been charged with producing the pornography — meaning they had contact with the abused children, according to the FBI.
Lawmen have identified and rescued 20 of those children, according to the FBI.
A spokesman with the U.S. Department of Justice declined to comment on the case.
The Associated Press contributed to this report.
____________________________________________________________
NOW A CROSS POST FROM ABSOLUTE ZERO AT:
http://absolutezerounited.blogspot.com/2008/03/obligations-and-boundaries.html
BUT PLEASE VISIT THAT LINK ABOVE FOR THE IMAGE'S AND MORE INFORMATION FROM THIER CLICKABLE LINKS!
Friday, March 07, 2008
Obligations and Boundaries
Have you ever noticed how similar the rhetoric of sex offender activists and pedophile activists is?
I have. I've noticed it a lot.
Of particular interest is their mutual desire to abolish age of consent laws. We don't need to ask why, we know why, don't we? Instead, let's talk about their reasoning.
On the one hand you have the pedophile group who say that children should be able to make their own decisions. We have Unico who says:
"There exist sexually-active 4-year-old girls who enjoy vaginal intercourse. What you or I think, is irrelevant to that fact.
Even first-time vaginal intercourse can be enjoyable, when preceded by several months of stretching
Anybody who would obstruct a prepubescent person from her inherent right to choose to have sexual intercourse is neither a true youth liberationist nor human rights advocate.
Access to sex education specific to prepubescent people should be mandated."
And here we have Lindsay Ashford being interviewed on the radio. What does he say about that issue?
Scott: Do you think that a 5 year old grasps what's going on well enough to be able to consent to sexual activity?
Lindsay: A 5 year old understands friendship. A 5 year old understands affection.
Scott: So can a 2 year old?
Lindsay: A 2 year old understands pleasure.
Scott: So they can consent to sex?
Lindsay: They can consent to pleasurable activity
Scott: Can a 6 month old do that?
Lindsay: I'm sure that 6 months old also have nerve endings and understanding and an understanding of what is pleasurable to them, yes
Scott: So a 6 month old can consent to sex
Lindsay: A 6 month old can consent to activity that it finds pleasurable
What does the petition we've talked so much about say? The one Jan Kruska and so many of her activist associates signed?
"Support broad sex education for children, and empower them to make their own decisions and stand up for their rights"
It then goes on to define 'children'
"Children should be defined as persons under the age of puberty."
And yes, many RSO activists signed it. So where do you draw the line? As far as age of consent goes? Is it 18? 16? 14? And with the age of consent law in place whatever that age is, what do you do when someone breaks that law? Slap them on the wrist? What I DO know for sure, is that the activists who are pushing for abolishment of age of consent laws and abolishment of punishment and registration for sex offenders were NOT convicted of having teenaged consensual sex. Their crimes were far worse than that and they are further exploiting children by trying to argue that the very RARE case of teenagers who end up on the registry is representative of their entire population. The vast majority of teens who find themselves convicted of a crime are not on the registry because of a consensual act. They may be listed as statutory rape, but you can bet your bottom dollar that it was a plea deal that gave them that listing.
Furthermore, if the crime was a felony charge, and the offender plead guilty and accepted a plea deal reducing the conviction on the books to a misdemeanor. Does that mean their crime was less than when they committed it? Absolutely not. The actual crime remains the same, but their legal maneuver reduced their penalty.
Let's look at an example of the propaganda. Jan Kruska said last year on a podcast with Tom Madison, that 95% of those on the registry are not dangerous people. She says they were convicted for things such as drunken mooning, or children "playing doctor". Does anyone know where she got this made up "fact"? Or how about Tim from Sosen, who says that 73% of all offenders on the sex offender registry committed their crimes against someone who was over the age of 18, while the fact is that 87% of victims were UNDER the age of 18. Why does Tim say that 40% of offenders were under the age of 18 upon conviction while the true number is that less than 10% were minors? Why would these people lie to you in an attempt to bring about social change?
Here are a couple of things you can do besides just hit and miss searching on a registry. Go to the Illinois sex offender registry and download it in entirely into an Excel document_ Sort and resort by the information that's on there. Say for example the age of the offender at the time of conviction along with the age of the victim. It's quite interesting. Did you know that the average age at conviction was mid thirties?
Georgia is another state that allows you to download their registry although it doesn't list the age of the victim. What you'll find is that the average age at conviction was 32 years old. You'll also find that less than 10% of those registered in Georgia were under the age of 20 at conviction. And in fact, at the present time in Georgia there are only 39 offenders under the age of 20. Even more interesting is the fact that 4 months ago there were a total of 70 teenaged sex offenders in Georgia. If these new laws are soooooo "draconian", if they are sooooo over broad, why is that number going DOWN instead of UP?
It's because it's not true what they say. It's also not true when they say their primary interest is child safety, and a desire for the laws to be 'effective'. The real truth is they are all pissed off sex offenders who don't want to accept responsibility for their actions. Tom Madison proved that when he rallied to gain support for releasing violent repeat sexual predators from their court imposed civil commitment. His primary interest was certainly not safety, his concern was the sex offenders wasting their time and the cost to non-sex offenders. LOL Well he DID say that after all.
And let us not forget one of the ring leaders of the RSO activists. Jim Freeman, co-founder and executive director of SoHopeful. Read more about that HERE, read also how Cheryl Griffith tried to cover it up.
And while you're at it, read what Dr. Gene Abel had to say from a study he did which included 16,109 adults who admitted sexually molesting at least one child.
40% of child molesters, who were later diagnosed as having pedophilia, had molested a child by the time they were 15 years old. An estimated 88% of child molesters and 95% of molestations (one person, multiple acts) are committed by individuals who now or in the future will also meet criteria for pedophilia. Pedophilic child molesters on average commit 10 times more sexual acts against children than nonpedophilic child molesters.
There may be innocent people imprisoned for murder who truly are innocent. But we don't lobby to abolish all laws regarding murder as a result. The same is true for sex offenders. ***IF*** these activists motives were truly about teenagers, THAT is what they would be addressing. But they are only further exploiting kids to further their own agenda. Very, very few teenagers are convicted for having consensual sex, it is rare, and it is the exception. But adults convicted for manipulating young teens is far too common. We understand this completely. They don't.
Graphics courtesy of Jacey
Labels: Age of Consent, Cheryl Griffiths, Gene Abel, girl chat, Jan Kruska, Jim Freeman, Pedophile Activism, pedophiles, SoClear, SoHopeful, SOSEN, Tom Madison
Stitches77 posted
http://www.nwfdailynews.com/article/12657/1
Child porn suspect wanted reform
James Freeman was co-founder of a group for changing sex offender tracking laws
Andrew Gant
Friday March 7th, 2008
SANTA ROSA BEACH — Before he was indicted in a global child porn ring, James Freeman was a registered sex offender leading a campaign to reform Megan's Law.
"It is illogical to present a system that tracks non-violent, one-crime one-victim, lowest-risk sex offenders as a benefit to public safety," reads a statement at SOhopeful.org, where Freeman was listed as executive director until his indictment Tuesday.
The group emphasizes it does not excuse sex offenses or abuse. With the 47-year-old Freeman indicted on a slew of federal child porn charges, his name has been erased from the Web site. SOhopeful's executive director position was listed as "unfilled" Friday.
Phone calls and e-mails to Carolyn Ferguson, a SOhopeful representative, were unanswered Friday. Meanwhile, a message posted on the group's public Web forum said members were "horrified and disheartened" and Freeman was removed from the organization.
"The Board of Directors is addressing internal structure and security issues," the message explained.
A message board for another sex offender law reform group — Reform Organization Attitude Restoration (ROAR) — contains posts from users who acknowledge the connection, but apparently had hoped to keep it secret.
"I think by now most of you know about the horrible story of Mystic of SOhopeful being charged in a large disgusting peodphile (sic) ring," writes one user. "I can only pray that this is some kind of misunderstanding or government 'fix.' "
Freeman's user name in the enterprise was "Mystikal," according to the 35-count indictment.
"… NO press release should be made unless the media picks up on a connection between Jim and Sohopefull (sic) and a big deal is being made of it first," the ROAR user writes.
SOhopeful's message was posted at 3 p.m. Friday, a day after The Daily News called for information.
Freeman was found guilty in March 1997 for lewd and lascivious acts with a 16-year-old in Georgia.
His registered address is 821 N. Church St. in Santa Rosa Beach.
SOhopeful International was established in 1999 to support changes in sex offender registration requirements, according to its Web site. Its materials claim existing legislation vilifies harmless offenders and floods a system that should track only dangerous predators.
A grand jury Tuesday decided Freeman and 11 others should stand trial on a number of federal charges: engaging in a child exploitation enterprise; conspiracy; advertisement of child pornography; transportation of child pornography; receipt of child pornography; and obstruction of justice.
Prosecutors say the men used vast file-sharing networks to use child porn as Internet currency and trade more than 400,000 images and videos of child sex abuse.
The indictment alleges Freeman shared at least two folders of child porn and then thanked the others for participating in the long-running enterprise.
"My thanks to you and all the others that together make this the greatest group of pedos to ever gather in one place," he wrote, according to the indictment. "I'm honored just to be a part of it."
Other users added their own files, including one who advertised videos of girls under 10 years old who were "heavily drugged" and abused.
If convicted, Freeman and the others each face 20 years to life in prison plus fines.
Some of the men also have been charged with producing the pornography — meaning they had contact with the abused children, according to the FBI.
Lawmen have identified and rescued 20 of those children, according to the FBI.
A spokesman with the U.S. Department of Justice declined to comment on the case.
The Associated Press contributed to this report.
____________________________________________________________
NOW A CROSS POST FROM ABSOLUTE ZERO AT:
http://absolutezerounited.blogspot.com/2008/03/obligations-and-boundaries.html
BUT PLEASE VISIT THAT LINK ABOVE FOR THE IMAGE'S AND MORE INFORMATION FROM THIER CLICKABLE LINKS!
Friday, March 07, 2008
Obligations and Boundaries
Have you ever noticed how similar the rhetoric of sex offender activists and pedophile activists is?
I have. I've noticed it a lot.
Of particular interest is their mutual desire to abolish age of consent laws. We don't need to ask why, we know why, don't we? Instead, let's talk about their reasoning.
On the one hand you have the pedophile group who say that children should be able to make their own decisions. We have Unico who says:
"There exist sexually-active 4-year-old girls who enjoy vaginal intercourse. What you or I think, is irrelevant to that fact.
Even first-time vaginal intercourse can be enjoyable, when preceded by several months of stretching
Anybody who would obstruct a prepubescent person from her inherent right to choose to have sexual intercourse is neither a true youth liberationist nor human rights advocate.
Access to sex education specific to prepubescent people should be mandated."
And here we have Lindsay Ashford being interviewed on the radio. What does he say about that issue?
Scott: Do you think that a 5 year old grasps what's going on well enough to be able to consent to sexual activity?
Lindsay: A 5 year old understands friendship. A 5 year old understands affection.
Scott: So can a 2 year old?
Lindsay: A 2 year old understands pleasure.
Scott: So they can consent to sex?
Lindsay: They can consent to pleasurable activity
Scott: Can a 6 month old do that?
Lindsay: I'm sure that 6 months old also have nerve endings and understanding and an understanding of what is pleasurable to them, yes
Scott: So a 6 month old can consent to sex
Lindsay: A 6 month old can consent to activity that it finds pleasurable
What does the petition we've talked so much about say? The one Jan Kruska and so many of her activist associates signed?
"Support broad sex education for children, and empower them to make their own decisions and stand up for their rights"
It then goes on to define 'children'
"Children should be defined as persons under the age of puberty."
And yes, many RSO activists signed it. So where do you draw the line? As far as age of consent goes? Is it 18? 16? 14? And with the age of consent law in place whatever that age is, what do you do when someone breaks that law? Slap them on the wrist? What I DO know for sure, is that the activists who are pushing for abolishment of age of consent laws and abolishment of punishment and registration for sex offenders were NOT convicted of having teenaged consensual sex. Their crimes were far worse than that and they are further exploiting children by trying to argue that the very RARE case of teenagers who end up on the registry is representative of their entire population. The vast majority of teens who find themselves convicted of a crime are not on the registry because of a consensual act. They may be listed as statutory rape, but you can bet your bottom dollar that it was a plea deal that gave them that listing.
Furthermore, if the crime was a felony charge, and the offender plead guilty and accepted a plea deal reducing the conviction on the books to a misdemeanor. Does that mean their crime was less than when they committed it? Absolutely not. The actual crime remains the same, but their legal maneuver reduced their penalty.
Let's look at an example of the propaganda. Jan Kruska said last year on a podcast with Tom Madison, that 95% of those on the registry are not dangerous people. She says they were convicted for things such as drunken mooning, or children "playing doctor". Does anyone know where she got this made up "fact"? Or how about Tim from Sosen, who says that 73% of all offenders on the sex offender registry committed their crimes against someone who was over the age of 18, while the fact is that 87% of victims were UNDER the age of 18. Why does Tim say that 40% of offenders were under the age of 18 upon conviction while the true number is that less than 10% were minors? Why would these people lie to you in an attempt to bring about social change?
Here are a couple of things you can do besides just hit and miss searching on a registry. Go to the Illinois sex offender registry and download it in entirely into an Excel document_ Sort and resort by the information that's on there. Say for example the age of the offender at the time of conviction along with the age of the victim. It's quite interesting. Did you know that the average age at conviction was mid thirties?
Georgia is another state that allows you to download their registry although it doesn't list the age of the victim. What you'll find is that the average age at conviction was 32 years old. You'll also find that less than 10% of those registered in Georgia were under the age of 20 at conviction. And in fact, at the present time in Georgia there are only 39 offenders under the age of 20. Even more interesting is the fact that 4 months ago there were a total of 70 teenaged sex offenders in Georgia. If these new laws are soooooo "draconian", if they are sooooo over broad, why is that number going DOWN instead of UP?
It's because it's not true what they say. It's also not true when they say their primary interest is child safety, and a desire for the laws to be 'effective'. The real truth is they are all pissed off sex offenders who don't want to accept responsibility for their actions. Tom Madison proved that when he rallied to gain support for releasing violent repeat sexual predators from their court imposed civil commitment. His primary interest was certainly not safety, his concern was the sex offenders wasting their time and the cost to non-sex offenders. LOL Well he DID say that after all.
And let us not forget one of the ring leaders of the RSO activists. Jim Freeman, co-founder and executive director of SoHopeful. Read more about that HERE, read also how Cheryl Griffith tried to cover it up.
And while you're at it, read what Dr. Gene Abel had to say from a study he did which included 16,109 adults who admitted sexually molesting at least one child.
40% of child molesters, who were later diagnosed as having pedophilia, had molested a child by the time they were 15 years old. An estimated 88% of child molesters and 95% of molestations (one person, multiple acts) are committed by individuals who now or in the future will also meet criteria for pedophilia. Pedophilic child molesters on average commit 10 times more sexual acts against children than nonpedophilic child molesters.
There may be innocent people imprisoned for murder who truly are innocent. But we don't lobby to abolish all laws regarding murder as a result. The same is true for sex offenders. ***IF*** these activists motives were truly about teenagers, THAT is what they would be addressing. But they are only further exploiting kids to further their own agenda. Very, very few teenagers are convicted for having consensual sex, it is rare, and it is the exception. But adults convicted for manipulating young teens is far too common. We understand this completely. They don't.
Graphics courtesy of Jacey
Labels: Age of Consent, Cheryl Griffiths, Gene Abel, girl chat, Jan Kruska, Jim Freeman, Pedophile Activism, pedophiles, SoClear, SoHopeful, SOSEN, Tom Madison
Stitches77 posted
Thursday, March 6, 2008
Indictment: James Freeman told users he was ’proud to be a part of it’, a child porn ring.
The groups (like SOclear, SOSEN, & Roar4Freedom) that ran the
Ohio Sex Offender Rally are really proud of their people. Some people just like
James Freeman who is the legal affairs director, executive director, and co-founder of SOhopeful!
Indictment: James Freeman told users he was 'proud to be a part of it' (with MUG)
Andrew Gant
Tuesday March 4th, 2008
PENSACOLA — A Santa Rosa Beach man is one of 12 people indicted in a vast Internet child porn enterprise that investigators say ran for two years.
The U. S. Attorney's Office has charged James Freeman, 47, with numerous federal crimes: engaging in a child exploitation enterprise, conspiracy, advertisement of child pornography, transportation of child pornography, receipt of child pornography and obstruction of justice.
Prosecutors say Freeman and at least 11 others used large file-sharing networks to share child porn over the Internet and installed "sophisticated encryption methods" to avoid detection.
Freeman's user name was "Mystikal," according to his indictment.
The charges were filed after investigators infiltrated the network. By then, the group had already traded more than 400,000 images and videos of child sex abuse, the U.S. Attorney's Office alleges.
The indictment lists messages posted by all 12 users, many including descriptions of teens or children engaged in sex acts. One describes girls under 10 years old who are "heavily drugged" and abused.
In one message, Freeman posts two folders and claims the pictures inside are "worth the download," the indictment states.
Later, he thanks the others for their participation: "My thanks to you and all the others that together make this the greatest group of pedos to ever gather in one place. I'm honored just to be a part of it," according to the indictment.
Two other men were arrested Feb. 29 in connection with the case, but are not named in the document_
If convicted, Freeman and the others each face 20 years to life in prison plus fines.
The case was investigated by the FBI and lawmen in Australia, Germany, the United Kingdom and Canada.
INDICTED BY THE GRAND JURY:
Michael Berger, 33, username "Box of Rocks" of Mechanicsville, Va.
James Freeman, 47, "Mystikal" of Santa Rosa Beach
Ruble Keys, 55, "Crazy Horse" of Medford, Ore.
Gary Lakey, 54, "Eggplant" of Anderson, Ind.
Marvin Lambert, 33, "Methuselah" of Indianapolis, Ind.
Neville McGarity, 40, "Wraith" of Medina, Texas
John Mosman, 46, "Pickleman" of Waterbury, Conn.
Warren Mumpower, 63, "Lizzard" of Spokane, Wash.
Raymond Roy, 54, "Nimo" of San Juan Capistrano, Calif.
Erik Wayerski, 46, "Lerch" of Round Rock, Texas
Warren Weber, 56, "Muad'Dib" of Boise, Idaho
Ronald White, 59, "RoadKill" of Burlington, N.C.
ARRESTED FEB. 29:
Stepan Bondarenko, 38, of Philadelphia, Pa.
Daniel Castleman, 43, of Lubbock, Texas
http://www.nwfdailynews.com/article/12561/1
PLEASE READ ABSOLUTE ZERO'S BLOG ABOUT THIS AND SEE THE CONNECTION THERE. THIS IS WHY WE, ABSOLUTE ZERO, WASP, PERVERTED JUSTICE AND MANY MANY MORE DO WHAT WE DO!!!
Here below I have cross posted their blog.
http://absolutezerounited.blogspot.com/2008/03/jim-freeman-was-honored.html
Who is Jim Freeman you may ask. You may wonder why everyone will be talking about him. Along with his user names. His pedo porn name of Mystikal, and his RSO sex offender defender names "Mystik" and "Mystikwarrior"
Not too long ago we asked a very important question. "Who are these men"?
We wrote about men who preyed on children. We wrote about child molesters. we wrote about rapists and child pornographers. We wrote about men who wanted to look at images of children, toddlers and infants being sexually abused, sometimes sadistically.
We know they're out there looking for it. They come here everyday looking for some of the most bizarre things like
pedo san francisco playgrounds
nude nine year old girl lolitas geting raped
hiding child porn
grown men fucking preteen
5yo porn pics
little boys erection pedo
outragious preteen forced fuck pics
childs rape pics
underage kids illegal incest rape force
grooming twelve year old preteens free pics
free xxx photos of old men and little boy sex
pedo fucking hard
i fantasize about forcing a girl into sex
And now, men like these have been busted in what has been called the "most sophisticated child pornography operation in recent memory". 12 Americans were indicted for "participating in a global child pornography ring that distributed more than 400,000 pictures and videos of children engaged in sexual activities." Children drugged and unable to do ANYTHING. Completely at the mercy of sick freaks. WHO will DARE to even attempt to defend this I ask you?
"The 12 men were charged with engaging in a child exploitation enterprise; illegally posting notices seeking to receive, exchange and distribute child porn across state lines; and obstructing of justice. Several also were charged with producing the pornography — meaning they had contact with the children who were exploited"
One conversation went like this:
“This one may offend here, so a word of caution, these girls are heavily drugged,” Roy, known as “Nimo,” wrote on July 10, 2007, according to the court documents. “Not much action to speak of, the girls are (sic) to (expletive deleted) up to move, or resist. Three girls, the first one being the youngest, around 8 or 9 yo.”
At the forefront of these men is none other than Jim Freeman. The executive director, legal director and co-founder of SoHopeful. A sex offender activist group where Tom Madison, Shirley Lowery, David Coffman,
and other pro-sex offenders got their start. I can't help but wonder why Cheryl Griffith wants to bury this story. Didn't she claim that children's safety was her top concern?
"I can only pray that this is some kind of misunderstanding or government "fix". No matter what it is, this could hurt all of us (groups and individuals) greatly. In my opinion, the best thing we could do is to not post anything about it in our groups about this at least about his connection to any RSO groups."
Google James Freeman's names, especially those baby raper defender names and read what he had to say. The very things all the RSO activists say. The very things all the pedo activists have to say. Read especially his commentary about the reason Christopher Barrios was raped and murdered. And while you're at it, watch out for Zman, you just never know where that little freak will pop up next. While you're reading, keep in the back of your mind that Jim's activism related to getting himself off the SOR. Watch him spin statistics to excuse his behavior.
"very few registered offenders have been clinically diagnosed as pedophiles. As a 'class', sexual offenders have the second-lowest recidivism rate of all criminal offenses"
Then look where he is today.
HT to Jacey for graphic
Labels: Cheryl Griffiths, Child Molester, Child Pornography, Child Sexual Abuse, Christopher Barrios, pedophiles, Repeat Sex Offender, Roar4Freedom, SoClear, SoHopeful, SOSEN, Tom Madison
___________________________________________________________
AND WITH STITCHES PERMISSION I WANTED TO ADD THIS COMMENT:
Birds of a feather flock together, indeed they do. And let us not forget for a moment some of the people the blame gamers have lost over the last few months.
Andrew Spedden member of Sosen
Johnny Ray Lee moderator/director of the North Carolina AND Wisconsin branch of SOSEN Yahoo groups, Media Director for SOSEN and Public Relations Director at ROAR4Freedom.
James Freeman, Executive Director Sohopeful
And let's not forget what Shirley Lowery said
"Child porn is a puzzler, Sending people to prison for something they see in their own home seems un-American"
"Pedophiles love children and enjoy being around them. The majority of pedophiles never act on their fantasies so they are never exposed"
Then she finished her ramblings out with this little gem
"Can I say that I am owner and chairman of SOSEN, a support group that deals with former members all across the US and that new legislation has been introduced which interfers with our program where we have a zero recidivism rate?"
Stitches
_____________________________________________________________
Ohio Sex Offender Rally are really proud of their people. Some people just like
James Freeman who is the legal affairs director, executive director, and co-founder of SOhopeful!
Indictment: James Freeman told users he was 'proud to be a part of it' (with MUG)
Andrew Gant
Tuesday March 4th, 2008
PENSACOLA — A Santa Rosa Beach man is one of 12 people indicted in a vast Internet child porn enterprise that investigators say ran for two years.
The U. S. Attorney's Office has charged James Freeman, 47, with numerous federal crimes: engaging in a child exploitation enterprise, conspiracy, advertisement of child pornography, transportation of child pornography, receipt of child pornography and obstruction of justice.
Prosecutors say Freeman and at least 11 others used large file-sharing networks to share child porn over the Internet and installed "sophisticated encryption methods" to avoid detection.
Freeman's user name was "Mystikal," according to his indictment.
The charges were filed after investigators infiltrated the network. By then, the group had already traded more than 400,000 images and videos of child sex abuse, the U.S. Attorney's Office alleges.
The indictment lists messages posted by all 12 users, many including descriptions of teens or children engaged in sex acts. One describes girls under 10 years old who are "heavily drugged" and abused.
In one message, Freeman posts two folders and claims the pictures inside are "worth the download," the indictment states.
Later, he thanks the others for their participation: "My thanks to you and all the others that together make this the greatest group of pedos to ever gather in one place. I'm honored just to be a part of it," according to the indictment.
Two other men were arrested Feb. 29 in connection with the case, but are not named in the document_
If convicted, Freeman and the others each face 20 years to life in prison plus fines.
The case was investigated by the FBI and lawmen in Australia, Germany, the United Kingdom and Canada.
INDICTED BY THE GRAND JURY:
Michael Berger, 33, username "Box of Rocks" of Mechanicsville, Va.
James Freeman, 47, "Mystikal" of Santa Rosa Beach
Ruble Keys, 55, "Crazy Horse" of Medford, Ore.
Gary Lakey, 54, "Eggplant" of Anderson, Ind.
Marvin Lambert, 33, "Methuselah" of Indianapolis, Ind.
Neville McGarity, 40, "Wraith" of Medina, Texas
John Mosman, 46, "Pickleman" of Waterbury, Conn.
Warren Mumpower, 63, "Lizzard" of Spokane, Wash.
Raymond Roy, 54, "Nimo" of San Juan Capistrano, Calif.
Erik Wayerski, 46, "Lerch" of Round Rock, Texas
Warren Weber, 56, "Muad'Dib" of Boise, Idaho
Ronald White, 59, "RoadKill" of Burlington, N.C.
ARRESTED FEB. 29:
Stepan Bondarenko, 38, of Philadelphia, Pa.
Daniel Castleman, 43, of Lubbock, Texas
http://www.nwfdailynews.com/article/12561/1
PLEASE READ ABSOLUTE ZERO'S BLOG ABOUT THIS AND SEE THE CONNECTION THERE. THIS IS WHY WE, ABSOLUTE ZERO, WASP, PERVERTED JUSTICE AND MANY MANY MORE DO WHAT WE DO!!!
Here below I have cross posted their blog.
http://absolutezerounited.blogspot.com/2008/03/jim-freeman-was-honored.html
Who is Jim Freeman you may ask. You may wonder why everyone will be talking about him. Along with his user names. His pedo porn name of Mystikal, and his RSO sex offender defender names "Mystik" and "Mystikwarrior"
Not too long ago we asked a very important question. "Who are these men"?
We wrote about men who preyed on children. We wrote about child molesters. we wrote about rapists and child pornographers. We wrote about men who wanted to look at images of children, toddlers and infants being sexually abused, sometimes sadistically.
We know they're out there looking for it. They come here everyday looking for some of the most bizarre things like
pedo san francisco playgrounds
nude nine year old girl lolitas geting raped
hiding child porn
grown men fucking preteen
5yo porn pics
little boys erection pedo
outragious preteen forced fuck pics
childs rape pics
underage kids illegal incest rape force
grooming twelve year old preteens free pics
free xxx photos of old men and little boy sex
pedo fucking hard
i fantasize about forcing a girl into sex
And now, men like these have been busted in what has been called the "most sophisticated child pornography operation in recent memory". 12 Americans were indicted for "participating in a global child pornography ring that distributed more than 400,000 pictures and videos of children engaged in sexual activities." Children drugged and unable to do ANYTHING. Completely at the mercy of sick freaks. WHO will DARE to even attempt to defend this I ask you?
"The 12 men were charged with engaging in a child exploitation enterprise; illegally posting notices seeking to receive, exchange and distribute child porn across state lines; and obstructing of justice. Several also were charged with producing the pornography — meaning they had contact with the children who were exploited"
One conversation went like this:
“This one may offend here, so a word of caution, these girls are heavily drugged,” Roy, known as “Nimo,” wrote on July 10, 2007, according to the court documents. “Not much action to speak of, the girls are (sic) to (expletive deleted) up to move, or resist. Three girls, the first one being the youngest, around 8 or 9 yo.”
At the forefront of these men is none other than Jim Freeman. The executive director, legal director and co-founder of SoHopeful. A sex offender activist group where Tom Madison, Shirley Lowery, David Coffman,
and other pro-sex offenders got their start. I can't help but wonder why Cheryl Griffith wants to bury this story. Didn't she claim that children's safety was her top concern?
"I can only pray that this is some kind of misunderstanding or government "fix". No matter what it is, this could hurt all of us (groups and individuals) greatly. In my opinion, the best thing we could do is to not post anything about it in our groups about this at least about his connection to any RSO groups."
Google James Freeman's names, especially those baby raper defender names and read what he had to say. The very things all the RSO activists say. The very things all the pedo activists have to say. Read especially his commentary about the reason Christopher Barrios was raped and murdered. And while you're at it, watch out for Zman, you just never know where that little freak will pop up next. While you're reading, keep in the back of your mind that Jim's activism related to getting himself off the SOR. Watch him spin statistics to excuse his behavior.
"very few registered offenders have been clinically diagnosed as pedophiles. As a 'class', sexual offenders have the second-lowest recidivism rate of all criminal offenses"
Then look where he is today.
HT to Jacey for graphic
Labels: Cheryl Griffiths, Child Molester, Child Pornography, Child Sexual Abuse, Christopher Barrios, pedophiles, Repeat Sex Offender, Roar4Freedom, SoClear, SoHopeful, SOSEN, Tom Madison
___________________________________________________________
AND WITH STITCHES PERMISSION I WANTED TO ADD THIS COMMENT:
Birds of a feather flock together, indeed they do. And let us not forget for a moment some of the people the blame gamers have lost over the last few months.
Andrew Spedden member of Sosen
Johnny Ray Lee moderator/director of the North Carolina AND Wisconsin branch of SOSEN Yahoo groups, Media Director for SOSEN and Public Relations Director at ROAR4Freedom.
James Freeman, Executive Director Sohopeful
And let's not forget what Shirley Lowery said
"Child porn is a puzzler, Sending people to prison for something they see in their own home seems un-American"
"Pedophiles love children and enjoy being around them. The majority of pedophiles never act on their fantasies so they are never exposed"
Then she finished her ramblings out with this little gem
"Can I say that I am owner and chairman of SOSEN, a support group that deals with former members all across the US and that new legislation has been introduced which interfers with our program where we have a zero recidivism rate?"
Stitches
_____________________________________________________________
Thursday, January 17, 2008
DARE TO FEEL THE PAIN
( CROSS POSTED FROM OUR FRIENDS AT ABSOLUTE ZERO:
http://absolutezerounited.blogspot.com/2008/01/dare-to-feel-pain.html )
Monday, January 14, 2008
Dare to feel the pain
"The Second Chance Society"
"Our mission is to fight a battle based on truth and documented facts. We shall encourage the young adults who have been cheated out of a childhood to work with us in finding realistic solutions for tomorrow's children. Those who have lived the hype and the fear will have a clear vision for the future and a roadmap to get there."
So speaks Shirley Lowery, the former CEO of Sosen. Recently shamed and ousted from her position during a gruesome hostile takeover, Shirley became depressed and announced her retirement. Unfortunately, it didn't last long. She's back with a vengeance and plotting her return to activism with her new mission statement, above.
One of her ways of making a come back will be to address America's youth. Not those who were victimized by sexual abusers but rather those she claims were cheated of a normal childhood by parents who were afraid that their child would be abused. She says:
"Adults threw all kinds of things on you to protect you from a fate worse than death.
Were you frightened or were you victimized and cheated out of the best years of your life due to the adults in your life that were scared witless?
It will be interesting to hear what you have to say about families being tossed out and burned out of their homes. People have been mugged and murdered.
These are things that are being done in your name."
Personally I think it will be far more interesting to hear from children who were groomed, manipulated and molested. Those who were sexually assaulted and battered. Those whose mother stood up for them .... and those that didn't. Those who had their abuse dismissed and/or denied, versus those who had validation of their right to be free of sexual abuse by having proper sentences given to their abusers. But that's me.
Shirley lost her American Chronicle articles, along with Jan Kruska and Jan's pseudonym Amanda Rogers. Of course Sosen itself lost their account also, but that's another story. This story is about Shirley's comeback.
"I am tempted to try again under another name but need an e-mail and profile completely separate from everything else.
I can still post on Arrivenet which gets some attention over time but not the grab of the Chronicles."
If you guys see her writings show up on the Chronicle under another name, could you please let me know?
Today we have the rare opportunity to observe one of her infamous blasts at society in progress. So far we have two versions she's presenting for group input. Let's look at some of the things she's saying.
She offers some snippets from a CNN transcript of John Walsh talking about his problems with sex addiction and how it hurt people in his life including his wife, children and himself. Shirley says:
"With this information we know that Walsh admitted to a raging sex addiction in 1999. He is well aware of the intensity of this condition and how it can ruin lives. If treatment worked for him it should work for many others with the same or a similar sex disorder. He owes the public an answer."
This is actually nothing new, all the RSO activists are trying to compare a sexual addiction to a sexual offense. This only serves to show their complete desperation and ongoing habit of pointing fingers, blaming others, and refusing to admit that they and they alone are fully responsible for their own actions. A sex addiction has nothing to do with sexually assaulting, raping, or molesting others unless the two are combined.
Next inline for finger pointing and blame-shifting we have Jessica Lunsford. We previously saw how Shirley made the allegation that Jessica had consensual sex with John Couey and then committed suicide by having Couey bury her alive. She's got a new spin on the situation, let's take a look.
"Every year we have young females who are abducted, raped and murdered. Jessica Lunsford was one such case. Her convicted killer, John Couey, did not suddenly turn murderer because of some long ago, non-violent sex crime. He turned killer due to the large amounts of crack cocaine that he ingested just hour's prior to Jessica's disappearance. By pretrial motion that information was withheld so even the juror's deciding his fate were not given this information. This tends to put a damper on the concept of a fair trial by a jury of your peers"
Let's stop there for a moment. Nobody has ever accused John Couey of murdering BECAUSE of his previous sex crime. Furthermore the same laws that allowed his drug use to be withheld in trial are the very same laws that prevent a jury from knowing a child molester on trial has a history of molesting 10 other children. It works both ways. And to make matters even worse for Shirley Lowery, in her haste to look like an idiot, completely fails to address the fact that John Couey kept Jessica for a week, raping her repeatedly before burying her alive. I hardly think he was on crack cocaine that entire time, and no one else thinks that either. That level of drug use would have killed him as no human body could withstand it.
"Jessica's horrific death would not have sparked any undue attention had it not been for old charges that required registration as a sex offender. That is the stage that was set for the American people. It was a power play with sex at the forefront and drugs pushed out of the way."
That's interesting. The way I recall events, Jessica's disappearance created a LOT of attention, BEFORE it was known a registered sex offender had kidnapped, repeatedly raped and killed by live burial little Jessica. THAT is how *I* recall it.
"Because of the way this case was presented everyone from home security people on up profited from this child's death. If John Couey had not fondled and tried to steal a kiss all of those years ago there would be no such thing as Jessica's Law."
Isn't it so terribly unfortunate that these things had to happen to Jessica before we could get our legislature to recognize what we've been telling them for years? But Shirley continues. She claims that the job the jurors did
"has been cheapened by the fact that even they were given partial truth to work with in a trial that was a mere mockery of justice.
This case was presented to a nation in such a manner as to induce public hysteria. It is time for us to remember that this is America where that sort of thing will not be tolerated.
For the health and welfare of this nation we had a right to know that the search was for a junkie rather than a sex fiend. Such careless, political power play has done irreparable harm to our country"
Search for a junkie? It was a search for an unknown person of unknown qualities who was acting for unknown reasons. It wasn't until after he was identified that anyone knew he was a registered sex offender. Furthermore, WHY does Shirley Lowery believe she has a right to know everything about a case yet you don't have a right to know that your next door neighbor molested a 5 year old child. When you have a 5 year old child.
WHY? Why is Shirley Lowery so hell-bent on blaming everyone except John Couey? Why is she so hell-bent on shifting attention AWAY from sex offenders? Could it be that her son, serving 60 years in prison for molesting Shirley's granddaughter, because of pleading guilty AND taking a plea bargain which REDUCED his sentence to SIXTY YEARS has caused her to flip her lid? Or was she always this wacked out?
"A child who has been victimized suffers from low-self esteem. If there is any shred of self-respect left it is quickly ripped away by society's very vocal perception. We are damaged, emotional cripples with diminished capabilities and nobody is willing to waste time on a lost cause. Society "saves" children by jerking them out of a bad situation and ensuring that the abuser is punished to the full extent of the law. There is no individual that notices or cares that only the faces have changed in a child's ongoing nightmare.
The hunger for revenge is what keeps these incidents as front-burner items. There are high-profile individuals who will tell you that a child deserves what he or she gets if they aren't willing to give up a loved one for 25 years. This is typical thinking for someone who has not experienced the situation. Most kids are not going to buy in to a 25-year future of public misery. We bide our time until we can walk away legally. The family is intact and there is no stigma. It is called survival.
The government never does anything right yet there are great expectations that they will fix the sex offender problem. Realistically, we are further away from a solution than we have ever been. Please stop the drama and pretend that your precious child has victimized another of your equally precious children. Dare to feel the pain of being alive with your heart ripped out. Get up close and personal with all aspects of such a situation and then give the world a valid opinion on how we should proceed."
Please pay close attention to this:
We bide our time until we can walk away legally.
The family is intact and there is no stigma.
It is called survival.
Dare to feel the pain of being alive with your heart ripped out
Shirley Lowery, I am addressing you.
You lost any credibility you may have had long ago. You have serious emotional and mental problems. Seek help for it and give this up before you make it any worse than you already have. You cannot be an activist anymore, no matter how much you want to be. We won't allow it.
Labels: Child Sexual Abuse, Jan Kruska, jessica lunsford, Jessica's Law, John Walsh, Sex Offender, Shirley Lowery, SOSEN
http://absolutezerounited.blogspot.com/2008/01/dare-to-feel-pain.html )
Monday, January 14, 2008
Dare to feel the pain
"The Second Chance Society"
"Our mission is to fight a battle based on truth and documented facts. We shall encourage the young adults who have been cheated out of a childhood to work with us in finding realistic solutions for tomorrow's children. Those who have lived the hype and the fear will have a clear vision for the future and a roadmap to get there."
So speaks Shirley Lowery, the former CEO of Sosen. Recently shamed and ousted from her position during a gruesome hostile takeover, Shirley became depressed and announced her retirement. Unfortunately, it didn't last long. She's back with a vengeance and plotting her return to activism with her new mission statement, above.
One of her ways of making a come back will be to address America's youth. Not those who were victimized by sexual abusers but rather those she claims were cheated of a normal childhood by parents who were afraid that their child would be abused. She says:
"Adults threw all kinds of things on you to protect you from a fate worse than death.
Were you frightened or were you victimized and cheated out of the best years of your life due to the adults in your life that were scared witless?
It will be interesting to hear what you have to say about families being tossed out and burned out of their homes. People have been mugged and murdered.
These are things that are being done in your name."
Personally I think it will be far more interesting to hear from children who were groomed, manipulated and molested. Those who were sexually assaulted and battered. Those whose mother stood up for them .... and those that didn't. Those who had their abuse dismissed and/or denied, versus those who had validation of their right to be free of sexual abuse by having proper sentences given to their abusers. But that's me.
Shirley lost her American Chronicle articles, along with Jan Kruska and Jan's pseudonym Amanda Rogers. Of course Sosen itself lost their account also, but that's another story. This story is about Shirley's comeback.
"I am tempted to try again under another name but need an e-mail and profile completely separate from everything else.
I can still post on Arrivenet which gets some attention over time but not the grab of the Chronicles."
If you guys see her writings show up on the Chronicle under another name, could you please let me know?
Today we have the rare opportunity to observe one of her infamous blasts at society in progress. So far we have two versions she's presenting for group input. Let's look at some of the things she's saying.
She offers some snippets from a CNN transcript of John Walsh talking about his problems with sex addiction and how it hurt people in his life including his wife, children and himself. Shirley says:
"With this information we know that Walsh admitted to a raging sex addiction in 1999. He is well aware of the intensity of this condition and how it can ruin lives. If treatment worked for him it should work for many others with the same or a similar sex disorder. He owes the public an answer."
This is actually nothing new, all the RSO activists are trying to compare a sexual addiction to a sexual offense. This only serves to show their complete desperation and ongoing habit of pointing fingers, blaming others, and refusing to admit that they and they alone are fully responsible for their own actions. A sex addiction has nothing to do with sexually assaulting, raping, or molesting others unless the two are combined.
Next inline for finger pointing and blame-shifting we have Jessica Lunsford. We previously saw how Shirley made the allegation that Jessica had consensual sex with John Couey and then committed suicide by having Couey bury her alive. She's got a new spin on the situation, let's take a look.
"Every year we have young females who are abducted, raped and murdered. Jessica Lunsford was one such case. Her convicted killer, John Couey, did not suddenly turn murderer because of some long ago, non-violent sex crime. He turned killer due to the large amounts of crack cocaine that he ingested just hour's prior to Jessica's disappearance. By pretrial motion that information was withheld so even the juror's deciding his fate were not given this information. This tends to put a damper on the concept of a fair trial by a jury of your peers"
Let's stop there for a moment. Nobody has ever accused John Couey of murdering BECAUSE of his previous sex crime. Furthermore the same laws that allowed his drug use to be withheld in trial are the very same laws that prevent a jury from knowing a child molester on trial has a history of molesting 10 other children. It works both ways. And to make matters even worse for Shirley Lowery, in her haste to look like an idiot, completely fails to address the fact that John Couey kept Jessica for a week, raping her repeatedly before burying her alive. I hardly think he was on crack cocaine that entire time, and no one else thinks that either. That level of drug use would have killed him as no human body could withstand it.
"Jessica's horrific death would not have sparked any undue attention had it not been for old charges that required registration as a sex offender. That is the stage that was set for the American people. It was a power play with sex at the forefront and drugs pushed out of the way."
That's interesting. The way I recall events, Jessica's disappearance created a LOT of attention, BEFORE it was known a registered sex offender had kidnapped, repeatedly raped and killed by live burial little Jessica. THAT is how *I* recall it.
"Because of the way this case was presented everyone from home security people on up profited from this child's death. If John Couey had not fondled and tried to steal a kiss all of those years ago there would be no such thing as Jessica's Law."
Isn't it so terribly unfortunate that these things had to happen to Jessica before we could get our legislature to recognize what we've been telling them for years? But Shirley continues. She claims that the job the jurors did
"has been cheapened by the fact that even they were given partial truth to work with in a trial that was a mere mockery of justice.
This case was presented to a nation in such a manner as to induce public hysteria. It is time for us to remember that this is America where that sort of thing will not be tolerated.
For the health and welfare of this nation we had a right to know that the search was for a junkie rather than a sex fiend. Such careless, political power play has done irreparable harm to our country"
Search for a junkie? It was a search for an unknown person of unknown qualities who was acting for unknown reasons. It wasn't until after he was identified that anyone knew he was a registered sex offender. Furthermore, WHY does Shirley Lowery believe she has a right to know everything about a case yet you don't have a right to know that your next door neighbor molested a 5 year old child. When you have a 5 year old child.
WHY? Why is Shirley Lowery so hell-bent on blaming everyone except John Couey? Why is she so hell-bent on shifting attention AWAY from sex offenders? Could it be that her son, serving 60 years in prison for molesting Shirley's granddaughter, because of pleading guilty AND taking a plea bargain which REDUCED his sentence to SIXTY YEARS has caused her to flip her lid? Or was she always this wacked out?
"A child who has been victimized suffers from low-self esteem. If there is any shred of self-respect left it is quickly ripped away by society's very vocal perception. We are damaged, emotional cripples with diminished capabilities and nobody is willing to waste time on a lost cause. Society "saves" children by jerking them out of a bad situation and ensuring that the abuser is punished to the full extent of the law. There is no individual that notices or cares that only the faces have changed in a child's ongoing nightmare.
The hunger for revenge is what keeps these incidents as front-burner items. There are high-profile individuals who will tell you that a child deserves what he or she gets if they aren't willing to give up a loved one for 25 years. This is typical thinking for someone who has not experienced the situation. Most kids are not going to buy in to a 25-year future of public misery. We bide our time until we can walk away legally. The family is intact and there is no stigma. It is called survival.
The government never does anything right yet there are great expectations that they will fix the sex offender problem. Realistically, we are further away from a solution than we have ever been. Please stop the drama and pretend that your precious child has victimized another of your equally precious children. Dare to feel the pain of being alive with your heart ripped out. Get up close and personal with all aspects of such a situation and then give the world a valid opinion on how we should proceed."
Please pay close attention to this:
We bide our time until we can walk away legally.
The family is intact and there is no stigma.
It is called survival.
Dare to feel the pain of being alive with your heart ripped out
Shirley Lowery, I am addressing you.
You lost any credibility you may have had long ago. You have serious emotional and mental problems. Seek help for it and give this up before you make it any worse than you already have. You cannot be an activist anymore, no matter how much you want to be. We won't allow it.
Labels: Child Sexual Abuse, Jan Kruska, jessica lunsford, Jessica's Law, John Walsh, Sex Offender, Shirley Lowery, SOSEN
Saturday, December 15, 2007
Pro-Sex Offender Rally - HIJACKED!
CROSSPOSTED FROM:
http://absolutezerounited.blogspot.com/2007/12/pro-sex-offender-rally-hijacked.html
TAGS: Cheryl Griffiths, Columbus Ohio Rally, Derek Logue, Jackie Sparling, Linda Pehrson, SoClear, SOSEN, Tom Madison
Tuesday, November 6, 2007
Roar For Freedom’s Micheal Price =AKA= Kiokwus Little Fox
Okay, so we have Shirley Lowery of SOSEN and her affiliate's at Roar For Freedom, Betty and Michael Price.
Michael price is a level 3 registered sex offender from Florida!
http://www.roarforfreedom.com/ContactUs.html
Okay let's take a look at his registry shall we?
http://offender.fdle.state.fl.us/offender/flyer.do?personId=15324
and
http://offender.fdle.state.fl.us/offender/offenderSearchNav.do?link=showSelectedPersonsList
If those links don't show up for you, go to http://offender.fdle.state.fl.us/offender/offenderSearchNav.do?link=advanced
and enter Michael Price, his middle name is Lawrence.
view his flyer, it says:
Price is registered as a Sexual Offender.
Michael L Price
Date Of Photo: 10/11/2004
Aliases
Michael Lawrence Price, Michael Price
Crime Information - Qualifying Offenses
Adjudication Date Crime Description Court Case Number Jurisdiction & State Adjudication
12/12/1994 SEX BAT BY ADULT/VCTM UNDER 12; F.S. 794.011(2) (PRINCIPAL IN ATTEMPT) 8705439 PINELLAS, FL Not Available
06/28/2004 Sx Offender fail to not. Sheriff; F.S. 943.0435(7) (PRINCIPAL) 0004218 PASCO, FL Guilty/convict
Victim Information
Minor:Yes
Michael is also knows as, Kiokwus Little Fox and lives currently in West Virginia. From what I heard, he lives in his wife's mothers basement LOSERS!!!
Here is some gathered info on him:
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
http://press.arrivenet.com/education/article.php/655536.html
Kiokwus Little Fox
S.O.S.E.N. Representative
Florida
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
http://www.topix.com/forum/city/darlington-sc/TRJAMNHOJGG227QA8
kiokwus WV ---USA
Joined: Dec 21, 2006
Comments: 16
Richwood, WV
ISP Location: Bradley, WV
|
#10
Apr 24, 2007
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
http://sexoffenderissues.blogspot.com/2007_01_14_archive.html
Police in North Little Rock accuse Colonel Donald Wodash of engaging in an ...... West Virginia needs tougher laws to crack down on Internet predators, ...
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
http://sentencing.typepad.com/sentencing_law_and_policy/2005/06/another_challen.html
Posted by: kiokwus | Jun 16, 2006 2:38:42 PM
Sometimes living the life of a sex offender still on probation leaves me feeling hopeless that my future will have much worth or purpose. Certainly my present does not have much satisfaction. To know that for the rest of my life my country will consider me a worthless throw away citizen is depressing. At least citizens have the right to vote, so actually I am less than a citizen who was born and raised here. My crime was getting two fifteen minute massages from a foreign exchange student staying in my apartment for a couple of weeks. Oh, yes, I also put aloe vera lotion on her sunburn after we spent an hour at the beach. I acted inappropriately by being naked in my apartment in the presence of the fifteen year old European girl, and for that I will be a registered sex offender for the remainder of my days. Personally, if my days were only a few it would be a joyous relief, because I have no career to return to, no retirement to contribute to since I basically am just making ends meet and getting by, and the mental anguish of daily being reminded that sex offenders are worse creatures on the planet. It did not matter that the girl offered the massages. That was my fault for being touched, especially while being naked for a massage. Regretting my error will never make the judge happy. Paying exorbitant attorneys' fees, losing my career, going to jail for six months, paying to participate in a sex offender course for 20 months, five years of probation where I must go three times a month to answer the same insidious questions that I have not had police contact, or contact with minors, and that I still live at the same address mean nothing to society. Corporations will not hire me. I cannot sell real estate. I cannot become a plumber, even if I had a crack big enough to fill the job. Jokes aside, this law does not consider the fairness of punishing one forever. This was not murder, folks. This was a dumb, single male who took in a stranger from another country who spoke the same language, and made a mistake of being naked in his apartment in her presence. Even murderers don't have to register for life. People who drive drunk and kill people don't have to register for life. Some guy who falls asleep while getting a massage does, though. Yes, I was wrong. I won't do that again. But that isn't punishment enough. Oh, did I forget to mention the $4,000 fine? And, why don't lying attorneys have to register for life? Everyone is guilty of something. Let's register everyone for something. Well, let's not register the police, the politicians, the judges, the district attorneys, the attorneys, or people who lie on the stand. They deserve special favor. All the while, the sex offenders who are all classified as the scum of society have no rights as convicted felons. Why not just kill them all? Start with me, because this system already killed me five years ago when the attorney told me to plead guilty after I told him I didn't have any more money to pay him. (He was doing such a mediocre job, that paying him an additional $7,500 to continue his worthless efforts would have been a greater crime.) Maybe after I am actually dead, not breathing any more, someone will realize that this country that is rapidly losing face around the world has a greater need to stop throwing away its citizens. Recycle bottles, cans, paper, and just for fun, felons who have completed their punishment phases. They are not all alike, but they still have redeemable value that cannot be utilized if discarded forever.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Notice how Micheal claims the girl was 15 years old in his short story above, however on the Florida State flyer of him it says:
12/12/1994 SEX BAT BY ADULT/VCTM UNDER 12; F.S. 794.011(2) (PRINCIPAL IN ATTEMPT) 8705439 PINELLAS, FL
Their state law crime description for this is:
If conviction between 1993 and 1994:
794.011(2)(a) Person 18 Or Older Commits Sexual Battery And/Or Injures Sexual Organs Of A Victim Less Than 12
2(a) A person 18 years of age or older who commits sexual battery upon, or in an attempt to commit sexual battery injures the sexual organs of, a person less than 12 years of age commits a capital felony, punishable as provided in ss. 775.082 and 921.141.
(http://offender.fdle.state.fl.us/offender/QualifyingOffenses.jsp1120)
Thanks to a VERY reliable source I got a hold of this info as well, written by Betty price:
http://www.prisontalk.com/forums/archive/index.php/t-52256.html
lencherovp03-24-2004, 11:13 AM
Here is our story. Would love to have people to chat with. Ariel thanks for directing me to this site.
:pissed:
I always was told that a person is innocent until proven guilty. I was always told the policemen, the judicial system, etc worked for the people. I always believed these things until I met my wonderful husband. I met him after being married to an abusive alcoholic for 26 years. I finally got the courage, the sense or whatever you want to call it and leave in July 1999. I met my husband Mike on August 31, 1999. It was love at first sight for us both. We originally met online and chatted for a couple days. I told him I wanted to meet him and he told me he had to tell me something first. I read a little of his story and told him you paid your dues and I wasn't one to judge without meeting and getting to know a person. We met the next evening. We moved in together a couple weeks later. He has helped me through nightmares, flashbacks, and has worked and supported us through most of our relationship. I have panic and anxiety attacks and chronic depression. At times, I faint for no apparent reason. They say this is the form of anxiety attacks I have. He has never pushed me, has done without so I had medication, has taken very good care of me, never complained about being awakened at at night when I have nightmares, holds me when I faint. He is the most wonderful, loving, caring person and I am so lucky to have found him. God was smiling down on me when we met. God meant for us to be together. Here is his story and our story:
In March 1984 Mike was arrested for capital sexual battery. He was coerced into pleading guilty. He was told he was drunk and didn't remember doing anything to his nine year old little girl, who was his oldest daughter. After he pled guilty the States Attorney told the Judge that the medical reports stated there was vaginal penetration. Mike was sentenced to 2 years house arrest and 15 years probation. He didn't see his children for two years. Near the end of the 2 year house arrest he was offered a job in Pennsylvania. The courts allowed his probation to go to Pennsylvania. He had an excellent job. In
December 1994 his youngest daughter said he had touched her breasts. He hadn't done so. The oldest daughter tried to speak on his behalf and
wasn't allowed to. She mainly wanted to let the system know that her sister was lying because she had been grounded. At this time the oldest
daughter was 17. The youngest was 13. He and his wife were having problems and he was planning to move out after Christmas. He was
with a misdemeanor for this as he pled guilty again deciding there was no reason to fight. He was depressed about many things in his life. His
wife moved back to Florida and went to the States Attorney and insisted they violate his probation. Pennsylvania had decided not to let Florida
know anything and she was furious. She had been telling her daughters their Father was dead and no longer of any importance to them, they
were to have nothing to do with him etc. I have this information from the oldest daughter who lives in our home with her two year old son. She
is very close to her Father. In December 2000 we lived near the youngest daughter in an apartment. I worked at the apartment complex. The
youngest daughter had told the oldest daughter she would consider meeting with us. We wrote to her. Her Father wrote and I wrote a
separate letter introducing myself. She then sent the police to our home telling them Mike was a Registered Sex Offender. Mike had me to call
the police station earlier in the year about that because we had watched something on the news about it and I was told he didn't have to Register.
They arrested him that night for Failure to Register. While he was in jail over night I went through his transcripts and read what the States
Attorney said to the judge about the medical reports. I already knew that wasn't true because the oldest daughter had already told me
he had never touched her in anyway and was only a loving Father her entire life! Then I found the copy of the medical record. It reads no
penetration and no evidence of any vaginal trauma or attempted entry! How could the States Attorney get away with this. I asked Mike
this question. He said because he had pled guilty the judge didn't have to actually see the medical report! Also, I found out that Mike hadn't
seen it either. Not only that, but he had never looked at any of the transcripts or anything since they had been in his possession. He said he
just wanted to forget it and get on with his life. Also, while looking at these papers I found his release papers from prison when they violated
his probation. No where on any of the papers does it say he is to register as a sex offender. As a matter of fact the only thing even close is
where they checked "NO, I do not have to register as a sexual predator". I was fired the same night that they arrested Mike and told we had
three days to move out. I didn't receive my last pay check from them. I don't remember what their reason was for keeping it. I also didn't
receive my Commissions due to me. Since I was fired they gave Mike a Public Pretender oops I mean defender. I was a wreck and haven't
worked outside the home since then. We started our own business as a Procurement Agency for the Offshore Gas and Oil Industry. In
November of 2002 our business was doing so well that Mike was able to quit his regular job and work at home with me. While doing research
on the internet to try and help him win this case I came across the Jacob Wetterling Act. It seems the DOC was to have registered Mike
before he even left prison. Had they done that he would have received a letter from the State yearly wanting all of his information as to
address, license number, license plate number, phone number, etc. He never received one of these until after he was arrested for
Failure to Register. We went to court on July 28, 2003 for this charge. The judge said to Mike, "Mr.. Price, I haven't read anything about
your case or seen anything about your case but I can tell you that if you take this to trial you will lose and you will be given 15 years and
the Jimmy Rice Act". Of course, after that he did the same thing and pled guilty. My 16 year old daughter, her boyfriend, Mikes now
26 year old daughter, a friend of ours and myself were all in court to speak on his behalf but were denied. My children and grandchildren
think just as much of Mike as his own daughter does. He has been a great step father to my children and loves them as his own.
He is serving 11/29 in the Pasco County Detention Center, Land O' Lakes, FL. Our customers somehow found out about Mikes criminal
background and the business is now gone. All because of lies and ignorant States Attorney's, State Judges and State Public Pretenders.
Mike's daughter has gone to an attorney and given her statement as a recantation. He went through all the transcripts etc and found
several other reasons besides her statement to file a Motion for Post Conviction Relief. That paperwork was filed on October 30, 2003 but
we have yet to be given a hearing date. They want to rush and put innocent people in jails and prisons but drag their feet on the truth.
I am finished venting now. I am a lot wiser and a whole lot less naive now. Thank you for listening.
Sincerely,
Michael and Betty Price
OTHER GREAT SOURCES ON MICHAEL & BETTY PRICE:
http://www.wikisposure.com/Michael_Price
http://www.wikisposure.com/Roar_for_Freedom
http://www.wikisposure.com/Betty_Price
Here is his wife, Betty's myspace page:
http://www.myspace.com/deweywyatt
Michael price is a level 3 registered sex offender from Florida!
http://www.roarforfreedom.com/ContactUs.html
Okay let's take a look at his registry shall we?
http://offender.fdle.state.fl.us/offender/flyer.do?personId=15324
and
http://offender.fdle.state.fl.us/offender/offenderSearchNav.do?link=showSelectedPersonsList
If those links don't show up for you, go to http://offender.fdle.state.fl.us/offender/offenderSearchNav.do?link=advanced
and enter Michael Price, his middle name is Lawrence.
view his flyer, it says:
Price is registered as a Sexual Offender.
Michael L Price
Date Of Photo: 10/11/2004
Aliases
Michael Lawrence Price, Michael Price
Crime Information - Qualifying Offenses
Adjudication Date Crime Description Court Case Number Jurisdiction & State Adjudication
12/12/1994 SEX BAT BY ADULT/VCTM UNDER 12; F.S. 794.011(2) (PRINCIPAL IN ATTEMPT) 8705439 PINELLAS, FL Not Available
06/28/2004 Sx Offender fail to not. Sheriff; F.S. 943.0435(7) (PRINCIPAL) 0004218 PASCO, FL Guilty/convict
Victim Information
Minor:Yes
Michael is also knows as, Kiokwus Little Fox and lives currently in West Virginia. From what I heard, he lives in his wife's mothers basement LOSERS!!!
Here is some gathered info on him:
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
http://press.arrivenet.com/education/article.php/655536.html
Kiokwus Little Fox
S.O.S.E.N. Representative
Florida
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
http://www.topix.com/forum/city/darlington-sc/TRJAMNHOJGG227QA8
kiokwus WV ---USA
Joined: Dec 21, 2006
Comments: 16
Richwood, WV
ISP Location: Bradley, WV
|
#10
Apr 24, 2007
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
http://sexoffenderissues.blogspot.com/2007_01_14_archive.html
Police in North Little Rock accuse Colonel Donald Wodash of engaging in an ...... West Virginia needs tougher laws to crack down on Internet predators, ...
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
http://sentencing.typepad.com/sentencing_law_and_policy/2005/06/another_challen.html
Posted by: kiokwus | Jun 16, 2006 2:38:42 PM
Sometimes living the life of a sex offender still on probation leaves me feeling hopeless that my future will have much worth or purpose. Certainly my present does not have much satisfaction. To know that for the rest of my life my country will consider me a worthless throw away citizen is depressing. At least citizens have the right to vote, so actually I am less than a citizen who was born and raised here. My crime was getting two fifteen minute massages from a foreign exchange student staying in my apartment for a couple of weeks. Oh, yes, I also put aloe vera lotion on her sunburn after we spent an hour at the beach. I acted inappropriately by being naked in my apartment in the presence of the fifteen year old European girl, and for that I will be a registered sex offender for the remainder of my days. Personally, if my days were only a few it would be a joyous relief, because I have no career to return to, no retirement to contribute to since I basically am just making ends meet and getting by, and the mental anguish of daily being reminded that sex offenders are worse creatures on the planet. It did not matter that the girl offered the massages. That was my fault for being touched, especially while being naked for a massage. Regretting my error will never make the judge happy. Paying exorbitant attorneys' fees, losing my career, going to jail for six months, paying to participate in a sex offender course for 20 months, five years of probation where I must go three times a month to answer the same insidious questions that I have not had police contact, or contact with minors, and that I still live at the same address mean nothing to society. Corporations will not hire me. I cannot sell real estate. I cannot become a plumber, even if I had a crack big enough to fill the job. Jokes aside, this law does not consider the fairness of punishing one forever. This was not murder, folks. This was a dumb, single male who took in a stranger from another country who spoke the same language, and made a mistake of being naked in his apartment in her presence. Even murderers don't have to register for life. People who drive drunk and kill people don't have to register for life. Some guy who falls asleep while getting a massage does, though. Yes, I was wrong. I won't do that again. But that isn't punishment enough. Oh, did I forget to mention the $4,000 fine? And, why don't lying attorneys have to register for life? Everyone is guilty of something. Let's register everyone for something. Well, let's not register the police, the politicians, the judges, the district attorneys, the attorneys, or people who lie on the stand. They deserve special favor. All the while, the sex offenders who are all classified as the scum of society have no rights as convicted felons. Why not just kill them all? Start with me, because this system already killed me five years ago when the attorney told me to plead guilty after I told him I didn't have any more money to pay him. (He was doing such a mediocre job, that paying him an additional $7,500 to continue his worthless efforts would have been a greater crime.) Maybe after I am actually dead, not breathing any more, someone will realize that this country that is rapidly losing face around the world has a greater need to stop throwing away its citizens. Recycle bottles, cans, paper, and just for fun, felons who have completed their punishment phases. They are not all alike, but they still have redeemable value that cannot be utilized if discarded forever.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Notice how Micheal claims the girl was 15 years old in his short story above, however on the Florida State flyer of him it says:
12/12/1994 SEX BAT BY ADULT/VCTM UNDER 12; F.S. 794.011(2) (PRINCIPAL IN ATTEMPT) 8705439 PINELLAS, FL
Their state law crime description for this is:
If conviction between 1993 and 1994:
794.011(2)(a) Person 18 Or Older Commits Sexual Battery And/Or Injures Sexual Organs Of A Victim Less Than 12
2(a) A person 18 years of age or older who commits sexual battery upon, or in an attempt to commit sexual battery injures the sexual organs of, a person less than 12 years of age commits a capital felony, punishable as provided in ss. 775.082 and 921.141.
(http://offender.fdle.state.fl.us/offender/QualifyingOffenses.jsp1120)
Thanks to a VERY reliable source I got a hold of this info as well, written by Betty price:
http://www.prisontalk.com/forums/archive/index.php/t-52256.html
lencherovp03-24-2004, 11:13 AM
Here is our story. Would love to have people to chat with. Ariel thanks for directing me to this site.
:pissed:
I always was told that a person is innocent until proven guilty. I was always told the policemen, the judicial system, etc worked for the people. I always believed these things until I met my wonderful husband. I met him after being married to an abusive alcoholic for 26 years. I finally got the courage, the sense or whatever you want to call it and leave in July 1999. I met my husband Mike on August 31, 1999. It was love at first sight for us both. We originally met online and chatted for a couple days. I told him I wanted to meet him and he told me he had to tell me something first. I read a little of his story and told him you paid your dues and I wasn't one to judge without meeting and getting to know a person. We met the next evening. We moved in together a couple weeks later. He has helped me through nightmares, flashbacks, and has worked and supported us through most of our relationship. I have panic and anxiety attacks and chronic depression. At times, I faint for no apparent reason. They say this is the form of anxiety attacks I have. He has never pushed me, has done without so I had medication, has taken very good care of me, never complained about being awakened at at night when I have nightmares, holds me when I faint. He is the most wonderful, loving, caring person and I am so lucky to have found him. God was smiling down on me when we met. God meant for us to be together. Here is his story and our story:
In March 1984 Mike was arrested for capital sexual battery. He was coerced into pleading guilty. He was told he was drunk and didn't remember doing anything to his nine year old little girl, who was his oldest daughter. After he pled guilty the States Attorney told the Judge that the medical reports stated there was vaginal penetration. Mike was sentenced to 2 years house arrest and 15 years probation. He didn't see his children for two years. Near the end of the 2 year house arrest he was offered a job in Pennsylvania. The courts allowed his probation to go to Pennsylvania. He had an excellent job. In
December 1994 his youngest daughter said he had touched her breasts. He hadn't done so. The oldest daughter tried to speak on his behalf and
wasn't allowed to. She mainly wanted to let the system know that her sister was lying because she had been grounded. At this time the oldest
daughter was 17. The youngest was 13. He and his wife were having problems and he was planning to move out after Christmas. He was
with a misdemeanor for this as he pled guilty again deciding there was no reason to fight. He was depressed about many things in his life. His
wife moved back to Florida and went to the States Attorney and insisted they violate his probation. Pennsylvania had decided not to let Florida
know anything and she was furious. She had been telling her daughters their Father was dead and no longer of any importance to them, they
were to have nothing to do with him etc. I have this information from the oldest daughter who lives in our home with her two year old son. She
is very close to her Father. In December 2000 we lived near the youngest daughter in an apartment. I worked at the apartment complex. The
youngest daughter had told the oldest daughter she would consider meeting with us. We wrote to her. Her Father wrote and I wrote a
separate letter introducing myself. She then sent the police to our home telling them Mike was a Registered Sex Offender. Mike had me to call
the police station earlier in the year about that because we had watched something on the news about it and I was told he didn't have to Register.
They arrested him that night for Failure to Register. While he was in jail over night I went through his transcripts and read what the States
Attorney said to the judge about the medical reports. I already knew that wasn't true because the oldest daughter had already told me
he had never touched her in anyway and was only a loving Father her entire life! Then I found the copy of the medical record. It reads no
penetration and no evidence of any vaginal trauma or attempted entry! How could the States Attorney get away with this. I asked Mike
this question. He said because he had pled guilty the judge didn't have to actually see the medical report! Also, I found out that Mike hadn't
seen it either. Not only that, but he had never looked at any of the transcripts or anything since they had been in his possession. He said he
just wanted to forget it and get on with his life. Also, while looking at these papers I found his release papers from prison when they violated
his probation. No where on any of the papers does it say he is to register as a sex offender. As a matter of fact the only thing even close is
where they checked "NO, I do not have to register as a sexual predator". I was fired the same night that they arrested Mike and told we had
three days to move out. I didn't receive my last pay check from them. I don't remember what their reason was for keeping it. I also didn't
receive my Commissions due to me. Since I was fired they gave Mike a Public Pretender oops I mean defender. I was a wreck and haven't
worked outside the home since then. We started our own business as a Procurement Agency for the Offshore Gas and Oil Industry. In
November of 2002 our business was doing so well that Mike was able to quit his regular job and work at home with me. While doing research
on the internet to try and help him win this case I came across the Jacob Wetterling Act. It seems the DOC was to have registered Mike
before he even left prison. Had they done that he would have received a letter from the State yearly wanting all of his information as to
address, license number, license plate number, phone number, etc. He never received one of these until after he was arrested for
Failure to Register. We went to court on July 28, 2003 for this charge. The judge said to Mike, "Mr.. Price, I haven't read anything about
your case or seen anything about your case but I can tell you that if you take this to trial you will lose and you will be given 15 years and
the Jimmy Rice Act". Of course, after that he did the same thing and pled guilty. My 16 year old daughter, her boyfriend, Mikes now
26 year old daughter, a friend of ours and myself were all in court to speak on his behalf but were denied. My children and grandchildren
think just as much of Mike as his own daughter does. He has been a great step father to my children and loves them as his own.
He is serving 11/29 in the Pasco County Detention Center, Land O' Lakes, FL. Our customers somehow found out about Mikes criminal
background and the business is now gone. All because of lies and ignorant States Attorney's, State Judges and State Public Pretenders.
Mike's daughter has gone to an attorney and given her statement as a recantation. He went through all the transcripts etc and found
several other reasons besides her statement to file a Motion for Post Conviction Relief. That paperwork was filed on October 30, 2003 but
we have yet to be given a hearing date. They want to rush and put innocent people in jails and prisons but drag their feet on the truth.
I am finished venting now. I am a lot wiser and a whole lot less naive now. Thank you for listening.
Sincerely,
Michael and Betty Price
OTHER GREAT SOURCES ON MICHAEL & BETTY PRICE:
http://www.wikisposure.com/Michael_Price
http://www.wikisposure.com/Roar_for_Freedom
http://www.wikisposure.com/Betty_Price
Here is his wife, Betty's myspace page:
http://www.myspace.com/deweywyatt
Wednesday, October 31, 2007
December 1st, Columbus, Ohio - Rally Against Child Abusers!
PLEASE SEE THIS LINK BELOW FOR COMPLETE BLOG WRITTEN BY ABSOLUTE ZERO!
http://absolutezerounited.blogspot.com/2007/10/december-1st-columbus-ohio-rally.html
Pro-Sex Offender Activists are planning to rally in Columbus Ohio, in an attempt to attack a bill being proposed to further protect children from sexual abuse.
Pro-Sex Offender Organizations planning to attend the rally include:
SO Clear - Headed up by Tom Madison
SOSEN - Headed up by Shirley Lowery
Roar4Freedom - Headed up by Betty Price
What you can do help:
Woman Against Sexual Predators (WASP) and several other Anti-Pedophile Organizations are taking the fight right back to SO Clear and SOSEN, they're Counter-Rallying in Ohio. You can find out more about them and how you can join them in Ohio to show your support here.
Another thing you can do, is, as Tom would say "raise the level of awareness"
http://absolutezerounited.blogspot.com/2007/10/december-1st-columbus-ohio-rally.html
Wednesday, October 10, 2007
Mark Lunsford, John Walsh, Jan Kruska, Shirley Lowery, and Thomas Madison
There are jokers out there that want to say that because Mark Lunsford has a myspace profile and has some adult things on his page, or he used his middle finger and said a curse word or two that he should not be allowed to promote Jessica's Law.
OMG PEOPLE ARE YOU FLIPPING SERIOUS?!
It isn't like he has any porn on there, there is nothing on there that is against myspace TOS (Terms Of Service)!
At least from what I have seen.
Okay so there was a picture of him flipping the bird, WHOOPTY FREAKING DO!
Okay what else, he owns a gun BIG WHOOPTY DOO again!
UPDATED THOUGHT (also noted in my comments):
Jan Kruska says that she is heavily armed and prepared to take action against those who seek to harm her or her family.
I really can't blame her for that, however doesn't she run around claiming that she is all about child safety and stuff? So if this lame attack can be pointed at Mark Lunsford, then shouldn't it also be pointed at Jan as well?
and the full screenshot where this statement by her was made can be found in this blog.
Okay what else, he is an ADULT SINGLE MALE with some pretty girls on his page, some are scantily clad but still not against myspace TOS (Except the two women showing their behinds off in underwear, that is against TOS. However those women are breaking myspace TOS, NOT Mark. Besides, when he added them they may not have even had those pictures up at the time).Okay, what else is there, UHHHH this picture is NOT from his profile page (referring to the second picture below), but from someone else's.
You can see at the top of this screenshot that this is from the profile of a 39 year old female from Virginia. And so what? It is a joke at strippers! Okay moving on...
Let's see what else can we find....well....nothing else? Okay then.
So what is the owner of this blog http://johnwalshournewgod.blogspot.com/ trying to get at?
That Mark Lunsford is supposed to be a role model for children? The stupidity!
Mark Lunsford is a father of a murdered child! A child that was raped and buried alive!
Just what is the owner of that blog trying to say and do here? What is their REAL AGENDA?
Mark Lunsford is not an animated character on TV, or an entertainer for children. Mark is not a politician, or running for congress.
Before the terrible and tragic death of his child, he was just like anyone else. A regular person, and a father first.
After the horrible event, he became a victim as did his daughter and the rest of their family and friends.
Mark as a father first with his heartache and concern to push him, wants to be sure that what happened to his daughter does not have to happen to anyone else and their child most.
So he is doing what he can to help change that, to help save another child, to help to protect them. To make right of what went so very wrong.
Mark Lunsford is a father, and a regular person just like most all of us here.
There is no role that he needs to play to get the point across that children need better laws. Any human should know this, understand this and have the ability to comprehend it. Unfortunately a little girls life had to be lost to make such a law, to get people to notice!
Is there no compassion? Is there no sympathy? How cruel of a heart does a person need to have to attack the fathers and mothers of murdered children? What black soulless and heartless human being can say these things?
AND WHAT ABOUT ADAM WALSH?
Well, okay the man has a sex addiction.Does this make him a criminal?With all the good that Adam does, in helping to put away REAL criminals do we want to disown him over that?
Adult sex is not a crime. Rape, murder, and child molestation is!
Adam is none of those things, so use your brains people! THINK...
Here is the transcript to CNN where John Walsh is being interviewed by Larry King. In that interview you can see a discussion about John Walsh and his relationships with other women.
http://edition.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0307/15/lkl.00.html
Still, he is not a criminal. He is still doing positive, not negative deeds like the person at the blog above claims (as pictured in the screenshot below).
I HAVE ALSO FOUND A ARTICLE FROM AMERICAN CHRONICLE (written by Shirley Lowery) ABOUT HIS ADDICTION.
AND WHO IS SHIRLEY LOWERY? (Click On The Image Above Of An Article She Wrote) (UPDATE: THIS ARTICLE HAS SINCE BEEN REMOVED BY AMERICAN CHRONICHLE DUE TO THE FACT OF WHICH SHIRLEY SUPPORTS IS CLEARLY WRONG & LIES SHE PRETENDS ARE FACTS!)
http://www.wikisposure.com/Shirley_Lowery
Shirley Lowery is an angry RSO (Registered Sex Offender) activist and former CEO of a nonprofit corporation called SOSEN, and the current founder of the "new" SOSEN. She is the mother of a convicted sex offender. Her son, Anthony Craig Oliver, plead guilty to 3 counts of sexually assaulting his daughter and received a 20 year prison sentence for each count. He lost his appeal.
Lowery is best known for denying the traumatic effects of child sexual abuse and always blaming the victim for their abuse.
Shirley Lowery says, about Jessica Lundsford:
“Jessica was not tortured and her death comes across more as an assisted suicide than a murder. There were no drugs or alcohol in her system and only her wrists were bound. She had not strained to try and free her arms. She could have easily kicked through the plastic bags but she did not. There were no tears, rips or even stretch marks. It looks as if she stepped into the bags of her own accord, squatted down and waited for death. There was no hand stretching upward as if asking foe help.”
---------------------------------------------------
What is SOSEN?
S.O.S.E.N.
Sex Offender Support & Education Network
http://www.wikisposure.com/SOSEN
SOSEN'S Claim:
Our mission is to advocate for positive sex offender policies and programs that include accountability, fair sentencing, and supportive community reintegration strategies. We support the rights of former offenders and their families to live peaceful, productive lives free from changing restrictions and public humiliation, discrimination, and violence.
WHAT'S THAT? Support for sex offenders?
SOSEN is a non-profit tax-deductible 501(c)(3) corporation.
WHAT? A 501(c)(3) Corporation for sex offenders!
Yep people, that's right. And that's not all folk's! SOSEN is in collaboration with SOCLEAR.
http://www.wikisposure.com/SOclear_Media_Productions
Who is behind SO Clear Media Productions, Inc.?(Copied And Pasted Straight From Thier website):
The people behind SO Clear Media Productions, Inc. are those citizens who are required to register as sex offenders, their families, and other American individuals and groups that are becoming aware of the sad consequences of poorly researched laws that have not solved the sex abuse problem but have created new victims (the families of registered sex offenders). Please see the BIO section for information on the SO Clear Media’s founder.
So Who Is The Founder?
Thomas Henry “Tom” Madison, a registered sex offender from the state of Oregon.
http://www.wikisposure.com/Tom_Madison
Convicted in 2000 of charges related to the sexual abuse of a 16 year old girl, he took a plea bargain and received five years probation for his offense. Part of his sentence is that he is required to register as a sex offender.
Portions Of A Letter From The Director(Thomas Madison)Of SOCLEAR:
Hello fellow Registered Sex Offenders (RSOs), activists, participants, and friends of liberty, freedom, a fair legal system, the US Constitution and human rights.
We intend to gain back the most basic of our lost constitutional, civil and human rights. These governmental legal violations of the Bill of Rights include: rights to due process, equal protection, avoiding double jeopardy, no ex-post facto laws, and the basic right of facing one’s accuser. All Americans are affected by these violations and are on the verge of losing habeas corpus at this current time.
The new vision will consist of activist-minded Registered Sex Offenders (and their family members) and others who are willing to take our struggle to the next higher level. For those of you who are truly RSO activists (thinkers, doers, organizers, and leaders), let us today take our urgent messages directly to those that declared war on our rights as citizens: Many of America’s politicians at all levels and the big ‘for-profit’ media corporations.
Thank you in advance for you involvement at a new level of RSO and RSO family rights involvement.
Sincerely,
Thomas Henry “Tom” Madison
Executive Director
SO CLEAR MEDIA PRODUCTIONS, INC.
An Oregon Non-Profit Corporation
SO Clear Media Productions, Inc. an Oregon Non-Profit Corporation
ANOTHER NON PROFIT ORGANIZATION FOR SEX OFFENDERS?
Executive Director
Thomas Henry “Tom” Madison
Thomas Henry “Tom” Madison has been involved with many different organizations and business associations, and is the first Executive Director of SO Clear Media Productions, Inc.
News Director
Amanda Rogers
Phoenix resident Amanda Rogers, creator of the highly acclaimed site "Operation Awareness" , is a freelance journalist and Senior Staff Writer. She has been following and researching sex offender and child safety legislation for over 15 years.
So who is Amanda Rogers? Well her real name is Jan Kruska, and she is a level one registered sex offender from Arizona.
Before she was married she was arrested in 1992 at the age of 22 in Glendale, Arizona for sexual conduct with a minor (his age-15). Her maiden name at the time of arrest was Gustafson. See the court case here: http://www.superiorcourt.maricopa.gov/docket/CriminalCourtCases/archivecaseInfo.asp?caseNumber=CR1992-004222
That was 15 years ago. Although according to Jan, she didn't get invloved in fighting the sex registry until a couple years after her arrest. She says it was in the spring of 1994 after hearing a news story about a little girl from New Jersey named, Megan Kanka. So is Thomas Lying, or did Jan lie to Thomas? Iether way, Thomas is not accurate and has not done his homework on Jan. Remember he claims that, "She has been following and researching sex offender and child safety legislation for over 15 years". NO, the truth is that she has been a registered sex offender for over 15 years.
http://www.wikisposure.com/Jan_Kruska
See this image of this screen shot here, it is written by Amanda Rogers/Jan Kruska(Gustafson) from her website, at Operation Awareness.
Also notice how at that time (in the screenshot above written only a few weeks ago), Jan/Amanda was trying to hide who she REALLY was, thus more hiding her true agenda. When Amanda Rogers was speaking of this anonymous women named, "Jane Marie Doe" it appears that she was in actuality speaking of her very own self.
She also seemed to be making a point in comparing her crime to that of the man who raped and murdered Jessica Lunsford. Like as if she was saying that what she did was not so bad. Like comparing apples and oranges fruit is fruit, a sex crime is a sex crime. Just because the direct actions differed and one may be way more heinous than the other it is still perverted & despicable either way!
However Jan/Amanda seems not feel this way.
See this screenshot for Amanda's confession that she really is Jan Kruska!
Notice how Jan says in that screenshot above that she plead guilty to the crime she committed as if she did so right away. Like she is such a wonderful citizen? Well the link I provided from the Maricopa County Superior Court Of Arizona seems to differ that claim, doesn't it?
Then she goes on to say it was ONLY a misdemeanor. She said she did not try to lie her way out of it, and it appears that she may have originally plead NOT guilty.
Then she goes on to say that Bruce Howland (see down below for more details) the other defendant aside of her was charged with a class 4 felony of child abuse, but it appears that she may have been personally summoned to court for child abuse as well.
Then she says that people are invited to go to the court and check her records for themselves, and she provided us with the case number. I have provided that court info/link she spoke of for you as mentioned above.
Then she goes on and mentions that she had JUST turned 22 when she was arrested, as if that makes a BIG difference there!
And the old claim of "THAT'S NOT MY MYSPACE ACCOUNT!" It WAS her account, if you searched her name, Jan Kruska that account popped up. If you typed in her email address, that myspace account popped up.
Myspace sends EVERYONE a confirmation/activation email for every account that gets set up. In order for that account to be activated in anyway shape or form, a link has to be followed from that email address to myspace for confirmation.
In that email it also says that if the person received that email in error what they can do to solve it. I have personally seen that myspace account with my own eyes, and I checked on it for three days in a row before she finally deleted it. In those three days it had been logged into each day.
NOTE: CT1 CHILD ABUSE CL 4 FEL (B); CTS2,3 SEXUAL CONDUCT W/MINOR CL 6 FELONIES; DR92-9781 GPD/ DOC 020792, BETWEEN 122591 - 020792
Her name at the time of the arrest was Jan Gustafson (maiden Name). Again you can see her court info here:
http://www.superiorcourt.maricopa.gov/docket/CriminalCourtCases/archivecaseInfo.asp?caseNumber=CR1992-004222
At first Jan may have plead not guilty
(6/11/1992 8:30 Original Arraignment Not Guilty)
Jan's criminal court record shows her case number is CR1992-004222-A.
The letter A at the end of that number should be followed for all of Jan's information, since there were two defendants.
The other defendant aside of Jan is BRUCE HOWLAND. His case number is the same as Jan's, however his ends with the letter B.
According to Jan, Bruce was the adopted father of the boy that Jan had sexual conduct with. Bruce was also I believe the boyfriend of Jan.
Jan claims that Bruce was an abusive alcoholic and that she cared for the boy very much. Well, I mean she was practically like his step mom right?
So Bruce would abuse her and the boy, which Jan claims made her and the boy even closer.
So how does Jan comfort a boy who is being abused by his father? She has sex with him!
It appears at that link I provided above that BOTH defendants, may have originally plead not guilty:
6/11/1992 8:30 Original Arraignment Not Guilty
Then it appears that they both went for a Not Guilty Plea Arraign On The Same Day:
6/11/1992 152 - ME: Not Guilty Plea Arraign - Party (A) 6/12/1992
6/11/1992 152 - ME: Not Guilty Plea Arraign - Party (B) 6/12/1992
Then one month afterwards looks like Jan decided to take the guilty plea bargain, changing it from not guilty to guilty:
7/10/1992 105 - ME: Plea Agreement/Change of Plea - Party (A)
7/10/1992 PAG - Plea Agreement - Party (A)
A "plea bargain" is a deal offered by a prosecutor as an incentive for a defendant to plead guilty. If every case in the justice system went to trial, the courts would be so overloaded that they would effectively be shut down. Plea bargaining allows the prosecutor to obtain guilty pleas in cases that might otherwise go to trial.
There are two types of plea bargain:
Charge Bargain
A "charge bargain" occurs when the prosecutor allows a defendant to "plead guilty to a lesser charge," or to only some of the charges that have been filed against him. For example, a defendant charged with burglary may be offered the opportunity to plead guilty to "attempted burglary." A defendant charged with Drunk Driving and Driving With License Suspended may be offered the opportunity to plead guilty to just the drunk driving charge.
Sentence Bargain
A "sentence bargain" occurs when a defendant is told in advance what his sentence will be if he pleads guilty. This can help a prosecutor obtain a conviction if, for example, a defendant is facing serious charges and is afraid of being hit with the "maximum" sentence. Typically, sentence bargains can only be granted if they are approved by the trial judge. Many jurisdictions severely limit sentence bargaining.
So what does Jan do, she considers herself to be a freelance journalist.
Amanda Rogers(Jan's "pen" name)is the alias used by Jan to discuss sex offender registries.
She can't use her real name since Jan is a registered sex offender, well she can but then who would trust her...right?
It appears that Jan hates the registry so much, that she wants to change the laws so that she does not have to be on one anymore.
Just like Thomas Madison of SOCLEAR, seems that they both feel and think this way.
They think and act as if they themselves are the victims, of course not the ones they sexually offended.
And according to Jan, the sex between her and her child victim was "consensual".
Well the boy's aunt didn't seem to agree with Jan's theory and had her arrested.
SOCLEAR is in collaboration with operation Awareness, another website dedicated to sex offenders.
And Jan is the owner and creator of Operation Awareness.
Now you have it, three scum bags with website's to help people who sexually offend other people including children!
And two of them are Registered Sex Offenders (RSO) themselves!
PLEASE VISIT THIS LINK! http://absolutezerounited.blogspot.com/2007/10/rest-of-story.html
JUST TRY AND DISPUTE THAT!
And this link too!
http://absolutezerounited.blogspot.com/2007/10/flawless-reasoning-no-more-victims-act.html
OMG PEOPLE ARE YOU FLIPPING SERIOUS?!
It isn't like he has any porn on there, there is nothing on there that is against myspace TOS (Terms Of Service)!
At least from what I have seen.
Okay so there was a picture of him flipping the bird, WHOOPTY FREAKING DO!
Okay what else, he owns a gun BIG WHOOPTY DOO again!
UPDATED THOUGHT (also noted in my comments):
Jan Kruska says that she is heavily armed and prepared to take action against those who seek to harm her or her family.
I really can't blame her for that, however doesn't she run around claiming that she is all about child safety and stuff? So if this lame attack can be pointed at Mark Lunsford, then shouldn't it also be pointed at Jan as well?
and the full screenshot where this statement by her was made can be found in this blog.
Okay what else, he is an ADULT SINGLE MALE with some pretty girls on his page, some are scantily clad but still not against myspace TOS (Except the two women showing their behinds off in underwear, that is against TOS. However those women are breaking myspace TOS, NOT Mark. Besides, when he added them they may not have even had those pictures up at the time).Okay, what else is there, UHHHH this picture is NOT from his profile page (referring to the second picture below), but from someone else's.
You can see at the top of this screenshot that this is from the profile of a 39 year old female from Virginia. And so what? It is a joke at strippers! Okay moving on...
Let's see what else can we find....well....nothing else? Okay then.
So what is the owner of this blog http://johnwalshournewgod.blogspot.com/ trying to get at?
That Mark Lunsford is supposed to be a role model for children? The stupidity!
Mark Lunsford is a father of a murdered child! A child that was raped and buried alive!
Just what is the owner of that blog trying to say and do here? What is their REAL AGENDA?
Mark Lunsford is not an animated character on TV, or an entertainer for children. Mark is not a politician, or running for congress.
Before the terrible and tragic death of his child, he was just like anyone else. A regular person, and a father first.
After the horrible event, he became a victim as did his daughter and the rest of their family and friends.
Mark as a father first with his heartache and concern to push him, wants to be sure that what happened to his daughter does not have to happen to anyone else and their child most.
So he is doing what he can to help change that, to help save another child, to help to protect them. To make right of what went so very wrong.
Mark Lunsford is a father, and a regular person just like most all of us here.
There is no role that he needs to play to get the point across that children need better laws. Any human should know this, understand this and have the ability to comprehend it. Unfortunately a little girls life had to be lost to make such a law, to get people to notice!
Is there no compassion? Is there no sympathy? How cruel of a heart does a person need to have to attack the fathers and mothers of murdered children? What black soulless and heartless human being can say these things?
AND WHAT ABOUT ADAM WALSH?
Well, okay the man has a sex addiction.Does this make him a criminal?With all the good that Adam does, in helping to put away REAL criminals do we want to disown him over that?
Adult sex is not a crime. Rape, murder, and child molestation is!
Adam is none of those things, so use your brains people! THINK...
Here is the transcript to CNN where John Walsh is being interviewed by Larry King. In that interview you can see a discussion about John Walsh and his relationships with other women.
http://edition.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0307/15/lkl.00.html
Still, he is not a criminal. He is still doing positive, not negative deeds like the person at the blog above claims (as pictured in the screenshot below).
I HAVE ALSO FOUND A ARTICLE FROM AMERICAN CHRONICLE (written by Shirley Lowery) ABOUT HIS ADDICTION.
AND WHO IS SHIRLEY LOWERY? (Click On The Image Above Of An Article She Wrote) (UPDATE: THIS ARTICLE HAS SINCE BEEN REMOVED BY AMERICAN CHRONICHLE DUE TO THE FACT OF WHICH SHIRLEY SUPPORTS IS CLEARLY WRONG & LIES SHE PRETENDS ARE FACTS!)
http://www.wikisposure.com/Shirley_Lowery
Shirley Lowery is an angry RSO (Registered Sex Offender) activist and former CEO of a nonprofit corporation called SOSEN, and the current founder of the "new" SOSEN. She is the mother of a convicted sex offender. Her son, Anthony Craig Oliver, plead guilty to 3 counts of sexually assaulting his daughter and received a 20 year prison sentence for each count. He lost his appeal.
Lowery is best known for denying the traumatic effects of child sexual abuse and always blaming the victim for their abuse.
Shirley Lowery says, about Jessica Lundsford:
“Jessica was not tortured and her death comes across more as an assisted suicide than a murder. There were no drugs or alcohol in her system and only her wrists were bound. She had not strained to try and free her arms. She could have easily kicked through the plastic bags but she did not. There were no tears, rips or even stretch marks. It looks as if she stepped into the bags of her own accord, squatted down and waited for death. There was no hand stretching upward as if asking foe help.”
---------------------------------------------------
What is SOSEN?
S.O.S.E.N.
Sex Offender Support & Education Network
http://www.wikisposure.com/SOSEN
SOSEN'S Claim:
Our mission is to advocate for positive sex offender policies and programs that include accountability, fair sentencing, and supportive community reintegration strategies. We support the rights of former offenders and their families to live peaceful, productive lives free from changing restrictions and public humiliation, discrimination, and violence.
WHAT'S THAT? Support for sex offenders?
SOSEN is a non-profit tax-deductible 501(c)(3) corporation.
WHAT? A 501(c)(3) Corporation for sex offenders!
Yep people, that's right. And that's not all folk's! SOSEN is in collaboration with SOCLEAR.
http://www.wikisposure.com/SOclear_Media_Productions
Who is behind SO Clear Media Productions, Inc.?(Copied And Pasted Straight From Thier website):
The people behind SO Clear Media Productions, Inc. are those citizens who are required to register as sex offenders, their families, and other American individuals and groups that are becoming aware of the sad consequences of poorly researched laws that have not solved the sex abuse problem but have created new victims (the families of registered sex offenders). Please see the BIO section for information on the SO Clear Media’s founder.
So Who Is The Founder?
Thomas Henry “Tom” Madison, a registered sex offender from the state of Oregon.
http://www.wikisposure.com/Tom_Madison
Convicted in 2000 of charges related to the sexual abuse of a 16 year old girl, he took a plea bargain and received five years probation for his offense. Part of his sentence is that he is required to register as a sex offender.
Portions Of A Letter From The Director(Thomas Madison)Of SOCLEAR:
Hello fellow Registered Sex Offenders (RSOs), activists, participants, and friends of liberty, freedom, a fair legal system, the US Constitution and human rights.
We intend to gain back the most basic of our lost constitutional, civil and human rights. These governmental legal violations of the Bill of Rights include: rights to due process, equal protection, avoiding double jeopardy, no ex-post facto laws, and the basic right of facing one’s accuser. All Americans are affected by these violations and are on the verge of losing habeas corpus at this current time.
The new vision will consist of activist-minded Registered Sex Offenders (and their family members) and others who are willing to take our struggle to the next higher level. For those of you who are truly RSO activists (thinkers, doers, organizers, and leaders), let us today take our urgent messages directly to those that declared war on our rights as citizens: Many of America’s politicians at all levels and the big ‘for-profit’ media corporations.
Thank you in advance for you involvement at a new level of RSO and RSO family rights involvement.
Sincerely,
Thomas Henry “Tom” Madison
Executive Director
SO CLEAR MEDIA PRODUCTIONS, INC.
An Oregon Non-Profit Corporation
SO Clear Media Productions, Inc. an Oregon Non-Profit Corporation
ANOTHER NON PROFIT ORGANIZATION FOR SEX OFFENDERS?
Executive Director
Thomas Henry “Tom” Madison
Thomas Henry “Tom” Madison has been involved with many different organizations and business associations, and is the first Executive Director of SO Clear Media Productions, Inc.
News Director
Amanda Rogers
Phoenix resident Amanda Rogers, creator of the highly acclaimed site "Operation Awareness" , is a freelance journalist and Senior Staff Writer. She has been following and researching sex offender and child safety legislation for over 15 years.
So who is Amanda Rogers? Well her real name is Jan Kruska, and she is a level one registered sex offender from Arizona.
Before she was married she was arrested in 1992 at the age of 22 in Glendale, Arizona for sexual conduct with a minor (his age-15). Her maiden name at the time of arrest was Gustafson. See the court case here: http://www.superiorcourt.maricopa.gov/docket/CriminalCourtCases/archivecaseInfo.asp?caseNumber=CR1992-004222
That was 15 years ago. Although according to Jan, she didn't get invloved in fighting the sex registry until a couple years after her arrest. She says it was in the spring of 1994 after hearing a news story about a little girl from New Jersey named, Megan Kanka. So is Thomas Lying, or did Jan lie to Thomas? Iether way, Thomas is not accurate and has not done his homework on Jan. Remember he claims that, "She has been following and researching sex offender and child safety legislation for over 15 years". NO, the truth is that she has been a registered sex offender for over 15 years.
http://www.wikisposure.com/Jan_Kruska
See this image of this screen shot here, it is written by Amanda Rogers/Jan Kruska(Gustafson) from her website, at Operation Awareness.
Also notice how at that time (in the screenshot above written only a few weeks ago), Jan/Amanda was trying to hide who she REALLY was, thus more hiding her true agenda. When Amanda Rogers was speaking of this anonymous women named, "Jane Marie Doe" it appears that she was in actuality speaking of her very own self.
She also seemed to be making a point in comparing her crime to that of the man who raped and murdered Jessica Lunsford. Like as if she was saying that what she did was not so bad. Like comparing apples and oranges fruit is fruit, a sex crime is a sex crime. Just because the direct actions differed and one may be way more heinous than the other it is still perverted & despicable either way!
However Jan/Amanda seems not feel this way.
See this screenshot for Amanda's confession that she really is Jan Kruska!
Notice how Jan says in that screenshot above that she plead guilty to the crime she committed as if she did so right away. Like she is such a wonderful citizen? Well the link I provided from the Maricopa County Superior Court Of Arizona seems to differ that claim, doesn't it?
Then she goes on to say it was ONLY a misdemeanor. She said she did not try to lie her way out of it, and it appears that she may have originally plead NOT guilty.
Then she goes on to say that Bruce Howland (see down below for more details) the other defendant aside of her was charged with a class 4 felony of child abuse, but it appears that she may have been personally summoned to court for child abuse as well.
Then she says that people are invited to go to the court and check her records for themselves, and she provided us with the case number. I have provided that court info/link she spoke of for you as mentioned above.
Then she goes on and mentions that she had JUST turned 22 when she was arrested, as if that makes a BIG difference there!
And the old claim of "THAT'S NOT MY MYSPACE ACCOUNT!" It WAS her account, if you searched her name, Jan Kruska that account popped up. If you typed in her email address, that myspace account popped up.
Myspace sends EVERYONE a confirmation/activation email for every account that gets set up. In order for that account to be activated in anyway shape or form, a link has to be followed from that email address to myspace for confirmation.
In that email it also says that if the person received that email in error what they can do to solve it. I have personally seen that myspace account with my own eyes, and I checked on it for three days in a row before she finally deleted it. In those three days it had been logged into each day.
NOTE: CT1 CHILD ABUSE CL 4 FEL (B); CTS2,3 SEXUAL CONDUCT W/MINOR CL 6 FELONIES; DR92-9781 GPD/ DOC 020792, BETWEEN 122591 - 020792
Her name at the time of the arrest was Jan Gustafson (maiden Name). Again you can see her court info here:
http://www.superiorcourt.maricopa.gov/docket/CriminalCourtCases/archivecaseInfo.asp?caseNumber=CR1992-004222
At first Jan may have plead not guilty
(6/11/1992 8:30 Original Arraignment Not Guilty)
Jan's criminal court record shows her case number is CR1992-004222-A.
The letter A at the end of that number should be followed for all of Jan's information, since there were two defendants.
The other defendant aside of Jan is BRUCE HOWLAND. His case number is the same as Jan's, however his ends with the letter B.
According to Jan, Bruce was the adopted father of the boy that Jan had sexual conduct with. Bruce was also I believe the boyfriend of Jan.
Jan claims that Bruce was an abusive alcoholic and that she cared for the boy very much. Well, I mean she was practically like his step mom right?
So Bruce would abuse her and the boy, which Jan claims made her and the boy even closer.
So how does Jan comfort a boy who is being abused by his father? She has sex with him!
It appears at that link I provided above that BOTH defendants, may have originally plead not guilty:
6/11/1992 8:30 Original Arraignment Not Guilty
Then it appears that they both went for a Not Guilty Plea Arraign On The Same Day:
6/11/1992 152 - ME: Not Guilty Plea Arraign - Party (A) 6/12/1992
6/11/1992 152 - ME: Not Guilty Plea Arraign - Party (B) 6/12/1992
Then one month afterwards looks like Jan decided to take the guilty plea bargain, changing it from not guilty to guilty:
7/10/1992 105 - ME: Plea Agreement/Change of Plea - Party (A)
7/10/1992 PAG - Plea Agreement - Party (A)
A "plea bargain" is a deal offered by a prosecutor as an incentive for a defendant to plead guilty. If every case in the justice system went to trial, the courts would be so overloaded that they would effectively be shut down. Plea bargaining allows the prosecutor to obtain guilty pleas in cases that might otherwise go to trial.
There are two types of plea bargain:
Charge Bargain
A "charge bargain" occurs when the prosecutor allows a defendant to "plead guilty to a lesser charge," or to only some of the charges that have been filed against him. For example, a defendant charged with burglary may be offered the opportunity to plead guilty to "attempted burglary." A defendant charged with Drunk Driving and Driving With License Suspended may be offered the opportunity to plead guilty to just the drunk driving charge.
Sentence Bargain
A "sentence bargain" occurs when a defendant is told in advance what his sentence will be if he pleads guilty. This can help a prosecutor obtain a conviction if, for example, a defendant is facing serious charges and is afraid of being hit with the "maximum" sentence. Typically, sentence bargains can only be granted if they are approved by the trial judge. Many jurisdictions severely limit sentence bargaining.
So what does Jan do, she considers herself to be a freelance journalist.
Amanda Rogers(Jan's "pen" name)is the alias used by Jan to discuss sex offender registries.
She can't use her real name since Jan is a registered sex offender, well she can but then who would trust her...right?
It appears that Jan hates the registry so much, that she wants to change the laws so that she does not have to be on one anymore.
Just like Thomas Madison of SOCLEAR, seems that they both feel and think this way.
They think and act as if they themselves are the victims, of course not the ones they sexually offended.
And according to Jan, the sex between her and her child victim was "consensual".
Well the boy's aunt didn't seem to agree with Jan's theory and had her arrested.
SOCLEAR is in collaboration with operation Awareness, another website dedicated to sex offenders.
And Jan is the owner and creator of Operation Awareness.
Now you have it, three scum bags with website's to help people who sexually offend other people including children!
And two of them are Registered Sex Offenders (RSO) themselves!
PLEASE VISIT THIS LINK! http://absolutezerounited.blogspot.com/2007/10/rest-of-story.html
JUST TRY AND DISPUTE THAT!
And this link too!
http://absolutezerounited.blogspot.com/2007/10/flawless-reasoning-no-more-victims-act.html
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
