( CROSS POSTED FROM OUR FRIENDS AT ABSOLUTE ZERO:
http://absolutezerounited.blogspot.com/2008/01/dare-to-feel-pain.html )
Monday, January 14, 2008
Dare to feel the pain
"The Second Chance Society"
"Our mission is to fight a battle based on truth and documented facts. We shall encourage the young adults who have been cheated out of a childhood to work with us in finding realistic solutions for tomorrow's children. Those who have lived the hype and the fear will have a clear vision for the future and a roadmap to get there."
So speaks Shirley Lowery, the former CEO of Sosen. Recently shamed and ousted from her position during a gruesome hostile takeover, Shirley became depressed and announced her retirement. Unfortunately, it didn't last long. She's back with a vengeance and plotting her return to activism with her new mission statement, above.
One of her ways of making a come back will be to address America's youth. Not those who were victimized by sexual abusers but rather those she claims were cheated of a normal childhood by parents who were afraid that their child would be abused. She says:
"Adults threw all kinds of things on you to protect you from a fate worse than death.
Were you frightened or were you victimized and cheated out of the best years of your life due to the adults in your life that were scared witless?
It will be interesting to hear what you have to say about families being tossed out and burned out of their homes. People have been mugged and murdered.
These are things that are being done in your name."
Personally I think it will be far more interesting to hear from children who were groomed, manipulated and molested. Those who were sexually assaulted and battered. Those whose mother stood up for them .... and those that didn't. Those who had their abuse dismissed and/or denied, versus those who had validation of their right to be free of sexual abuse by having proper sentences given to their abusers. But that's me.
Shirley lost her American Chronicle articles, along with Jan Kruska and Jan's pseudonym Amanda Rogers. Of course Sosen itself lost their account also, but that's another story. This story is about Shirley's comeback.
"I am tempted to try again under another name but need an e-mail and profile completely separate from everything else.
I can still post on Arrivenet which gets some attention over time but not the grab of the Chronicles."
If you guys see her writings show up on the Chronicle under another name, could you please let me know?
Today we have the rare opportunity to observe one of her infamous blasts at society in progress. So far we have two versions she's presenting for group input. Let's look at some of the things she's saying.
She offers some snippets from a CNN transcript of John Walsh talking about his problems with sex addiction and how it hurt people in his life including his wife, children and himself. Shirley says:
"With this information we know that Walsh admitted to a raging sex addiction in 1999. He is well aware of the intensity of this condition and how it can ruin lives. If treatment worked for him it should work for many others with the same or a similar sex disorder. He owes the public an answer."
This is actually nothing new, all the RSO activists are trying to compare a sexual addiction to a sexual offense. This only serves to show their complete desperation and ongoing habit of pointing fingers, blaming others, and refusing to admit that they and they alone are fully responsible for their own actions. A sex addiction has nothing to do with sexually assaulting, raping, or molesting others unless the two are combined.
Next inline for finger pointing and blame-shifting we have Jessica Lunsford. We previously saw how Shirley made the allegation that Jessica had consensual sex with John Couey and then committed suicide by having Couey bury her alive. She's got a new spin on the situation, let's take a look.
"Every year we have young females who are abducted, raped and murdered. Jessica Lunsford was one such case. Her convicted killer, John Couey, did not suddenly turn murderer because of some long ago, non-violent sex crime. He turned killer due to the large amounts of crack cocaine that he ingested just hour's prior to Jessica's disappearance. By pretrial motion that information was withheld so even the juror's deciding his fate were not given this information. This tends to put a damper on the concept of a fair trial by a jury of your peers"
Let's stop there for a moment. Nobody has ever accused John Couey of murdering BECAUSE of his previous sex crime. Furthermore the same laws that allowed his drug use to be withheld in trial are the very same laws that prevent a jury from knowing a child molester on trial has a history of molesting 10 other children. It works both ways. And to make matters even worse for Shirley Lowery, in her haste to look like an idiot, completely fails to address the fact that John Couey kept Jessica for a week, raping her repeatedly before burying her alive. I hardly think he was on crack cocaine that entire time, and no one else thinks that either. That level of drug use would have killed him as no human body could withstand it.
"Jessica's horrific death would not have sparked any undue attention had it not been for old charges that required registration as a sex offender. That is the stage that was set for the American people. It was a power play with sex at the forefront and drugs pushed out of the way."
That's interesting. The way I recall events, Jessica's disappearance created a LOT of attention, BEFORE it was known a registered sex offender had kidnapped, repeatedly raped and killed by live burial little Jessica. THAT is how *I* recall it.
"Because of the way this case was presented everyone from home security people on up profited from this child's death. If John Couey had not fondled and tried to steal a kiss all of those years ago there would be no such thing as Jessica's Law."
Isn't it so terribly unfortunate that these things had to happen to Jessica before we could get our legislature to recognize what we've been telling them for years? But Shirley continues. She claims that the job the jurors did
"has been cheapened by the fact that even they were given partial truth to work with in a trial that was a mere mockery of justice.
This case was presented to a nation in such a manner as to induce public hysteria. It is time for us to remember that this is America where that sort of thing will not be tolerated.
For the health and welfare of this nation we had a right to know that the search was for a junkie rather than a sex fiend. Such careless, political power play has done irreparable harm to our country"
Search for a junkie? It was a search for an unknown person of unknown qualities who was acting for unknown reasons. It wasn't until after he was identified that anyone knew he was a registered sex offender. Furthermore, WHY does Shirley Lowery believe she has a right to know everything about a case yet you don't have a right to know that your next door neighbor molested a 5 year old child. When you have a 5 year old child.
WHY? Why is Shirley Lowery so hell-bent on blaming everyone except John Couey? Why is she so hell-bent on shifting attention AWAY from sex offenders? Could it be that her son, serving 60 years in prison for molesting Shirley's granddaughter, because of pleading guilty AND taking a plea bargain which REDUCED his sentence to SIXTY YEARS has caused her to flip her lid? Or was she always this wacked out?
"A child who has been victimized suffers from low-self esteem. If there is any shred of self-respect left it is quickly ripped away by society's very vocal perception. We are damaged, emotional cripples with diminished capabilities and nobody is willing to waste time on a lost cause. Society "saves" children by jerking them out of a bad situation and ensuring that the abuser is punished to the full extent of the law. There is no individual that notices or cares that only the faces have changed in a child's ongoing nightmare.
The hunger for revenge is what keeps these incidents as front-burner items. There are high-profile individuals who will tell you that a child deserves what he or she gets if they aren't willing to give up a loved one for 25 years. This is typical thinking for someone who has not experienced the situation. Most kids are not going to buy in to a 25-year future of public misery. We bide our time until we can walk away legally. The family is intact and there is no stigma. It is called survival.
The government never does anything right yet there are great expectations that they will fix the sex offender problem. Realistically, we are further away from a solution than we have ever been. Please stop the drama and pretend that your precious child has victimized another of your equally precious children. Dare to feel the pain of being alive with your heart ripped out. Get up close and personal with all aspects of such a situation and then give the world a valid opinion on how we should proceed."
Please pay close attention to this:
We bide our time until we can walk away legally.
The family is intact and there is no stigma.
It is called survival.
Dare to feel the pain of being alive with your heart ripped out
Shirley Lowery, I am addressing you.
You lost any credibility you may have had long ago. You have serious emotional and mental problems. Seek help for it and give this up before you make it any worse than you already have. You cannot be an activist anymore, no matter how much you want to be. We won't allow it.
Labels: Child Sexual Abuse, Jan Kruska, jessica lunsford, Jessica's Law, John Walsh, Sex Offender, Shirley Lowery, SOSEN
Showing posts with label Jessica Lunsford. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Jessica Lunsford. Show all posts
Thursday, January 17, 2008
Wednesday, October 10, 2007
Mark Lunsford, John Walsh, Jan Kruska, Shirley Lowery, and Thomas Madison
There are jokers out there that want to say that because Mark Lunsford has a myspace profile and has some adult things on his page, or he used his middle finger and said a curse word or two that he should not be allowed to promote Jessica's Law.
OMG PEOPLE ARE YOU FLIPPING SERIOUS?!
It isn't like he has any porn on there, there is nothing on there that is against myspace TOS (Terms Of Service)!
At least from what I have seen.
Okay so there was a picture of him flipping the bird, WHOOPTY FREAKING DO!
Okay what else, he owns a gun BIG WHOOPTY DOO again!
UPDATED THOUGHT (also noted in my comments):
Jan Kruska says that she is heavily armed and prepared to take action against those who seek to harm her or her family.
I really can't blame her for that, however doesn't she run around claiming that she is all about child safety and stuff? So if this lame attack can be pointed at Mark Lunsford, then shouldn't it also be pointed at Jan as well?
and the full screenshot where this statement by her was made can be found in this blog.
Okay what else, he is an ADULT SINGLE MALE with some pretty girls on his page, some are scantily clad but still not against myspace TOS (Except the two women showing their behinds off in underwear, that is against TOS. However those women are breaking myspace TOS, NOT Mark. Besides, when he added them they may not have even had those pictures up at the time).Okay, what else is there, UHHHH this picture is NOT from his profile page (referring to the second picture below), but from someone else's.
You can see at the top of this screenshot that this is from the profile of a 39 year old female from Virginia. And so what? It is a joke at strippers! Okay moving on...
Let's see what else can we find....well....nothing else? Okay then.
So what is the owner of this blog http://johnwalshournewgod.blogspot.com/ trying to get at?
That Mark Lunsford is supposed to be a role model for children? The stupidity!
Mark Lunsford is a father of a murdered child! A child that was raped and buried alive!
Just what is the owner of that blog trying to say and do here? What is their REAL AGENDA?
Mark Lunsford is not an animated character on TV, or an entertainer for children. Mark is not a politician, or running for congress.
Before the terrible and tragic death of his child, he was just like anyone else. A regular person, and a father first.
After the horrible event, he became a victim as did his daughter and the rest of their family and friends.
Mark as a father first with his heartache and concern to push him, wants to be sure that what happened to his daughter does not have to happen to anyone else and their child most.
So he is doing what he can to help change that, to help save another child, to help to protect them. To make right of what went so very wrong.
Mark Lunsford is a father, and a regular person just like most all of us here.
There is no role that he needs to play to get the point across that children need better laws. Any human should know this, understand this and have the ability to comprehend it. Unfortunately a little girls life had to be lost to make such a law, to get people to notice!
Is there no compassion? Is there no sympathy? How cruel of a heart does a person need to have to attack the fathers and mothers of murdered children? What black soulless and heartless human being can say these things?
AND WHAT ABOUT ADAM WALSH?
Well, okay the man has a sex addiction.Does this make him a criminal?With all the good that Adam does, in helping to put away REAL criminals do we want to disown him over that?
Adult sex is not a crime. Rape, murder, and child molestation is!
Adam is none of those things, so use your brains people! THINK...
Here is the transcript to CNN where John Walsh is being interviewed by Larry King. In that interview you can see a discussion about John Walsh and his relationships with other women.
http://edition.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0307/15/lkl.00.html
Still, he is not a criminal. He is still doing positive, not negative deeds like the person at the blog above claims (as pictured in the screenshot below).
I HAVE ALSO FOUND A ARTICLE FROM AMERICAN CHRONICLE (written by Shirley Lowery) ABOUT HIS ADDICTION.
AND WHO IS SHIRLEY LOWERY? (Click On The Image Above Of An Article She Wrote) (UPDATE: THIS ARTICLE HAS SINCE BEEN REMOVED BY AMERICAN CHRONICHLE DUE TO THE FACT OF WHICH SHIRLEY SUPPORTS IS CLEARLY WRONG & LIES SHE PRETENDS ARE FACTS!)
http://www.wikisposure.com/Shirley_Lowery
Shirley Lowery is an angry RSO (Registered Sex Offender) activist and former CEO of a nonprofit corporation called SOSEN, and the current founder of the "new" SOSEN. She is the mother of a convicted sex offender. Her son, Anthony Craig Oliver, plead guilty to 3 counts of sexually assaulting his daughter and received a 20 year prison sentence for each count. He lost his appeal.
Lowery is best known for denying the traumatic effects of child sexual abuse and always blaming the victim for their abuse.
Shirley Lowery says, about Jessica Lundsford:
“Jessica was not tortured and her death comes across more as an assisted suicide than a murder. There were no drugs or alcohol in her system and only her wrists were bound. She had not strained to try and free her arms. She could have easily kicked through the plastic bags but she did not. There were no tears, rips or even stretch marks. It looks as if she stepped into the bags of her own accord, squatted down and waited for death. There was no hand stretching upward as if asking foe help.”
---------------------------------------------------
What is SOSEN?
S.O.S.E.N.
Sex Offender Support & Education Network
http://www.wikisposure.com/SOSEN
SOSEN'S Claim:
Our mission is to advocate for positive sex offender policies and programs that include accountability, fair sentencing, and supportive community reintegration strategies. We support the rights of former offenders and their families to live peaceful, productive lives free from changing restrictions and public humiliation, discrimination, and violence.
WHAT'S THAT? Support for sex offenders?
SOSEN is a non-profit tax-deductible 501(c)(3) corporation.
WHAT? A 501(c)(3) Corporation for sex offenders!
Yep people, that's right. And that's not all folk's! SOSEN is in collaboration with SOCLEAR.
http://www.wikisposure.com/SOclear_Media_Productions
Who is behind SO Clear Media Productions, Inc.?(Copied And Pasted Straight From Thier website):
The people behind SO Clear Media Productions, Inc. are those citizens who are required to register as sex offenders, their families, and other American individuals and groups that are becoming aware of the sad consequences of poorly researched laws that have not solved the sex abuse problem but have created new victims (the families of registered sex offenders). Please see the BIO section for information on the SO Clear Media’s founder.
So Who Is The Founder?
Thomas Henry “Tom” Madison, a registered sex offender from the state of Oregon.
http://www.wikisposure.com/Tom_Madison
Convicted in 2000 of charges related to the sexual abuse of a 16 year old girl, he took a plea bargain and received five years probation for his offense. Part of his sentence is that he is required to register as a sex offender.
Portions Of A Letter From The Director(Thomas Madison)Of SOCLEAR:
Hello fellow Registered Sex Offenders (RSOs), activists, participants, and friends of liberty, freedom, a fair legal system, the US Constitution and human rights.
We intend to gain back the most basic of our lost constitutional, civil and human rights. These governmental legal violations of the Bill of Rights include: rights to due process, equal protection, avoiding double jeopardy, no ex-post facto laws, and the basic right of facing one’s accuser. All Americans are affected by these violations and are on the verge of losing habeas corpus at this current time.
The new vision will consist of activist-minded Registered Sex Offenders (and their family members) and others who are willing to take our struggle to the next higher level. For those of you who are truly RSO activists (thinkers, doers, organizers, and leaders), let us today take our urgent messages directly to those that declared war on our rights as citizens: Many of America’s politicians at all levels and the big ‘for-profit’ media corporations.
Thank you in advance for you involvement at a new level of RSO and RSO family rights involvement.
Sincerely,
Thomas Henry “Tom” Madison
Executive Director
SO CLEAR MEDIA PRODUCTIONS, INC.
An Oregon Non-Profit Corporation
SO Clear Media Productions, Inc. an Oregon Non-Profit Corporation
ANOTHER NON PROFIT ORGANIZATION FOR SEX OFFENDERS?
Executive Director
Thomas Henry “Tom” Madison
Thomas Henry “Tom” Madison has been involved with many different organizations and business associations, and is the first Executive Director of SO Clear Media Productions, Inc.
News Director
Amanda Rogers
Phoenix resident Amanda Rogers, creator of the highly acclaimed site "Operation Awareness" , is a freelance journalist and Senior Staff Writer. She has been following and researching sex offender and child safety legislation for over 15 years.
So who is Amanda Rogers? Well her real name is Jan Kruska, and she is a level one registered sex offender from Arizona.
Before she was married she was arrested in 1992 at the age of 22 in Glendale, Arizona for sexual conduct with a minor (his age-15). Her maiden name at the time of arrest was Gustafson. See the court case here: http://www.superiorcourt.maricopa.gov/docket/CriminalCourtCases/archivecaseInfo.asp?caseNumber=CR1992-004222
That was 15 years ago. Although according to Jan, she didn't get invloved in fighting the sex registry until a couple years after her arrest. She says it was in the spring of 1994 after hearing a news story about a little girl from New Jersey named, Megan Kanka. So is Thomas Lying, or did Jan lie to Thomas? Iether way, Thomas is not accurate and has not done his homework on Jan. Remember he claims that, "She has been following and researching sex offender and child safety legislation for over 15 years". NO, the truth is that she has been a registered sex offender for over 15 years.
http://www.wikisposure.com/Jan_Kruska
See this image of this screen shot here, it is written by Amanda Rogers/Jan Kruska(Gustafson) from her website, at Operation Awareness.
Also notice how at that time (in the screenshot above written only a few weeks ago), Jan/Amanda was trying to hide who she REALLY was, thus more hiding her true agenda. When Amanda Rogers was speaking of this anonymous women named, "Jane Marie Doe" it appears that she was in actuality speaking of her very own self.
She also seemed to be making a point in comparing her crime to that of the man who raped and murdered Jessica Lunsford. Like as if she was saying that what she did was not so bad. Like comparing apples and oranges fruit is fruit, a sex crime is a sex crime. Just because the direct actions differed and one may be way more heinous than the other it is still perverted & despicable either way!
However Jan/Amanda seems not feel this way.
See this screenshot for Amanda's confession that she really is Jan Kruska!
Notice how Jan says in that screenshot above that she plead guilty to the crime she committed as if she did so right away. Like she is such a wonderful citizen? Well the link I provided from the Maricopa County Superior Court Of Arizona seems to differ that claim, doesn't it?
Then she goes on to say it was ONLY a misdemeanor. She said she did not try to lie her way out of it, and it appears that she may have originally plead NOT guilty.
Then she goes on to say that Bruce Howland (see down below for more details) the other defendant aside of her was charged with a class 4 felony of child abuse, but it appears that she may have been personally summoned to court for child abuse as well.
Then she says that people are invited to go to the court and check her records for themselves, and she provided us with the case number. I have provided that court info/link she spoke of for you as mentioned above.
Then she goes on and mentions that she had JUST turned 22 when she was arrested, as if that makes a BIG difference there!
And the old claim of "THAT'S NOT MY MYSPACE ACCOUNT!" It WAS her account, if you searched her name, Jan Kruska that account popped up. If you typed in her email address, that myspace account popped up.
Myspace sends EVERYONE a confirmation/activation email for every account that gets set up. In order for that account to be activated in anyway shape or form, a link has to be followed from that email address to myspace for confirmation.
In that email it also says that if the person received that email in error what they can do to solve it. I have personally seen that myspace account with my own eyes, and I checked on it for three days in a row before she finally deleted it. In those three days it had been logged into each day.
NOTE: CT1 CHILD ABUSE CL 4 FEL (B); CTS2,3 SEXUAL CONDUCT W/MINOR CL 6 FELONIES; DR92-9781 GPD/ DOC 020792, BETWEEN 122591 - 020792
Her name at the time of the arrest was Jan Gustafson (maiden Name). Again you can see her court info here:
http://www.superiorcourt.maricopa.gov/docket/CriminalCourtCases/archivecaseInfo.asp?caseNumber=CR1992-004222
At first Jan may have plead not guilty
(6/11/1992 8:30 Original Arraignment Not Guilty)
Jan's criminal court record shows her case number is CR1992-004222-A.
The letter A at the end of that number should be followed for all of Jan's information, since there were two defendants.
The other defendant aside of Jan is BRUCE HOWLAND. His case number is the same as Jan's, however his ends with the letter B.
According to Jan, Bruce was the adopted father of the boy that Jan had sexual conduct with. Bruce was also I believe the boyfriend of Jan.
Jan claims that Bruce was an abusive alcoholic and that she cared for the boy very much. Well, I mean she was practically like his step mom right?
So Bruce would abuse her and the boy, which Jan claims made her and the boy even closer.
So how does Jan comfort a boy who is being abused by his father? She has sex with him!
It appears at that link I provided above that BOTH defendants, may have originally plead not guilty:
6/11/1992 8:30 Original Arraignment Not Guilty
Then it appears that they both went for a Not Guilty Plea Arraign On The Same Day:
6/11/1992 152 - ME: Not Guilty Plea Arraign - Party (A) 6/12/1992
6/11/1992 152 - ME: Not Guilty Plea Arraign - Party (B) 6/12/1992
Then one month afterwards looks like Jan decided to take the guilty plea bargain, changing it from not guilty to guilty:
7/10/1992 105 - ME: Plea Agreement/Change of Plea - Party (A)
7/10/1992 PAG - Plea Agreement - Party (A)
A "plea bargain" is a deal offered by a prosecutor as an incentive for a defendant to plead guilty. If every case in the justice system went to trial, the courts would be so overloaded that they would effectively be shut down. Plea bargaining allows the prosecutor to obtain guilty pleas in cases that might otherwise go to trial.
There are two types of plea bargain:
Charge Bargain
A "charge bargain" occurs when the prosecutor allows a defendant to "plead guilty to a lesser charge," or to only some of the charges that have been filed against him. For example, a defendant charged with burglary may be offered the opportunity to plead guilty to "attempted burglary." A defendant charged with Drunk Driving and Driving With License Suspended may be offered the opportunity to plead guilty to just the drunk driving charge.
Sentence Bargain
A "sentence bargain" occurs when a defendant is told in advance what his sentence will be if he pleads guilty. This can help a prosecutor obtain a conviction if, for example, a defendant is facing serious charges and is afraid of being hit with the "maximum" sentence. Typically, sentence bargains can only be granted if they are approved by the trial judge. Many jurisdictions severely limit sentence bargaining.
So what does Jan do, she considers herself to be a freelance journalist.
Amanda Rogers(Jan's "pen" name)is the alias used by Jan to discuss sex offender registries.
She can't use her real name since Jan is a registered sex offender, well she can but then who would trust her...right?
It appears that Jan hates the registry so much, that she wants to change the laws so that she does not have to be on one anymore.
Just like Thomas Madison of SOCLEAR, seems that they both feel and think this way.
They think and act as if they themselves are the victims, of course not the ones they sexually offended.
And according to Jan, the sex between her and her child victim was "consensual".
Well the boy's aunt didn't seem to agree with Jan's theory and had her arrested.
SOCLEAR is in collaboration with operation Awareness, another website dedicated to sex offenders.
And Jan is the owner and creator of Operation Awareness.
Now you have it, three scum bags with website's to help people who sexually offend other people including children!
And two of them are Registered Sex Offenders (RSO) themselves!
PLEASE VISIT THIS LINK! http://absolutezerounited.blogspot.com/2007/10/rest-of-story.html
JUST TRY AND DISPUTE THAT!
And this link too!
http://absolutezerounited.blogspot.com/2007/10/flawless-reasoning-no-more-victims-act.html
OMG PEOPLE ARE YOU FLIPPING SERIOUS?!
It isn't like he has any porn on there, there is nothing on there that is against myspace TOS (Terms Of Service)!
At least from what I have seen.
Okay so there was a picture of him flipping the bird, WHOOPTY FREAKING DO!
Okay what else, he owns a gun BIG WHOOPTY DOO again!
UPDATED THOUGHT (also noted in my comments):
Jan Kruska says that she is heavily armed and prepared to take action against those who seek to harm her or her family.
I really can't blame her for that, however doesn't she run around claiming that she is all about child safety and stuff? So if this lame attack can be pointed at Mark Lunsford, then shouldn't it also be pointed at Jan as well?
and the full screenshot where this statement by her was made can be found in this blog.
Okay what else, he is an ADULT SINGLE MALE with some pretty girls on his page, some are scantily clad but still not against myspace TOS (Except the two women showing their behinds off in underwear, that is against TOS. However those women are breaking myspace TOS, NOT Mark. Besides, when he added them they may not have even had those pictures up at the time).Okay, what else is there, UHHHH this picture is NOT from his profile page (referring to the second picture below), but from someone else's.
You can see at the top of this screenshot that this is from the profile of a 39 year old female from Virginia. And so what? It is a joke at strippers! Okay moving on...
Let's see what else can we find....well....nothing else? Okay then.
So what is the owner of this blog http://johnwalshournewgod.blogspot.com/ trying to get at?
That Mark Lunsford is supposed to be a role model for children? The stupidity!
Mark Lunsford is a father of a murdered child! A child that was raped and buried alive!
Just what is the owner of that blog trying to say and do here? What is their REAL AGENDA?
Mark Lunsford is not an animated character on TV, or an entertainer for children. Mark is not a politician, or running for congress.
Before the terrible and tragic death of his child, he was just like anyone else. A regular person, and a father first.
After the horrible event, he became a victim as did his daughter and the rest of their family and friends.
Mark as a father first with his heartache and concern to push him, wants to be sure that what happened to his daughter does not have to happen to anyone else and their child most.
So he is doing what he can to help change that, to help save another child, to help to protect them. To make right of what went so very wrong.
Mark Lunsford is a father, and a regular person just like most all of us here.
There is no role that he needs to play to get the point across that children need better laws. Any human should know this, understand this and have the ability to comprehend it. Unfortunately a little girls life had to be lost to make such a law, to get people to notice!
Is there no compassion? Is there no sympathy? How cruel of a heart does a person need to have to attack the fathers and mothers of murdered children? What black soulless and heartless human being can say these things?
AND WHAT ABOUT ADAM WALSH?
Well, okay the man has a sex addiction.Does this make him a criminal?With all the good that Adam does, in helping to put away REAL criminals do we want to disown him over that?
Adult sex is not a crime. Rape, murder, and child molestation is!
Adam is none of those things, so use your brains people! THINK...
Here is the transcript to CNN where John Walsh is being interviewed by Larry King. In that interview you can see a discussion about John Walsh and his relationships with other women.
http://edition.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0307/15/lkl.00.html
Still, he is not a criminal. He is still doing positive, not negative deeds like the person at the blog above claims (as pictured in the screenshot below).
I HAVE ALSO FOUND A ARTICLE FROM AMERICAN CHRONICLE (written by Shirley Lowery) ABOUT HIS ADDICTION.
AND WHO IS SHIRLEY LOWERY? (Click On The Image Above Of An Article She Wrote) (UPDATE: THIS ARTICLE HAS SINCE BEEN REMOVED BY AMERICAN CHRONICHLE DUE TO THE FACT OF WHICH SHIRLEY SUPPORTS IS CLEARLY WRONG & LIES SHE PRETENDS ARE FACTS!)
http://www.wikisposure.com/Shirley_Lowery
Shirley Lowery is an angry RSO (Registered Sex Offender) activist and former CEO of a nonprofit corporation called SOSEN, and the current founder of the "new" SOSEN. She is the mother of a convicted sex offender. Her son, Anthony Craig Oliver, plead guilty to 3 counts of sexually assaulting his daughter and received a 20 year prison sentence for each count. He lost his appeal.
Lowery is best known for denying the traumatic effects of child sexual abuse and always blaming the victim for their abuse.
Shirley Lowery says, about Jessica Lundsford:
“Jessica was not tortured and her death comes across more as an assisted suicide than a murder. There were no drugs or alcohol in her system and only her wrists were bound. She had not strained to try and free her arms. She could have easily kicked through the plastic bags but she did not. There were no tears, rips or even stretch marks. It looks as if she stepped into the bags of her own accord, squatted down and waited for death. There was no hand stretching upward as if asking foe help.”
---------------------------------------------------
What is SOSEN?
S.O.S.E.N.
Sex Offender Support & Education Network
http://www.wikisposure.com/SOSEN
SOSEN'S Claim:
Our mission is to advocate for positive sex offender policies and programs that include accountability, fair sentencing, and supportive community reintegration strategies. We support the rights of former offenders and their families to live peaceful, productive lives free from changing restrictions and public humiliation, discrimination, and violence.
WHAT'S THAT? Support for sex offenders?
SOSEN is a non-profit tax-deductible 501(c)(3) corporation.
WHAT? A 501(c)(3) Corporation for sex offenders!
Yep people, that's right. And that's not all folk's! SOSEN is in collaboration with SOCLEAR.
http://www.wikisposure.com/SOclear_Media_Productions
Who is behind SO Clear Media Productions, Inc.?(Copied And Pasted Straight From Thier website):
The people behind SO Clear Media Productions, Inc. are those citizens who are required to register as sex offenders, their families, and other American individuals and groups that are becoming aware of the sad consequences of poorly researched laws that have not solved the sex abuse problem but have created new victims (the families of registered sex offenders). Please see the BIO section for information on the SO Clear Media’s founder.
So Who Is The Founder?
Thomas Henry “Tom” Madison, a registered sex offender from the state of Oregon.
http://www.wikisposure.com/Tom_Madison
Convicted in 2000 of charges related to the sexual abuse of a 16 year old girl, he took a plea bargain and received five years probation for his offense. Part of his sentence is that he is required to register as a sex offender.
Portions Of A Letter From The Director(Thomas Madison)Of SOCLEAR:
Hello fellow Registered Sex Offenders (RSOs), activists, participants, and friends of liberty, freedom, a fair legal system, the US Constitution and human rights.
We intend to gain back the most basic of our lost constitutional, civil and human rights. These governmental legal violations of the Bill of Rights include: rights to due process, equal protection, avoiding double jeopardy, no ex-post facto laws, and the basic right of facing one’s accuser. All Americans are affected by these violations and are on the verge of losing habeas corpus at this current time.
The new vision will consist of activist-minded Registered Sex Offenders (and their family members) and others who are willing to take our struggle to the next higher level. For those of you who are truly RSO activists (thinkers, doers, organizers, and leaders), let us today take our urgent messages directly to those that declared war on our rights as citizens: Many of America’s politicians at all levels and the big ‘for-profit’ media corporations.
Thank you in advance for you involvement at a new level of RSO and RSO family rights involvement.
Sincerely,
Thomas Henry “Tom” Madison
Executive Director
SO CLEAR MEDIA PRODUCTIONS, INC.
An Oregon Non-Profit Corporation
SO Clear Media Productions, Inc. an Oregon Non-Profit Corporation
ANOTHER NON PROFIT ORGANIZATION FOR SEX OFFENDERS?
Executive Director
Thomas Henry “Tom” Madison
Thomas Henry “Tom” Madison has been involved with many different organizations and business associations, and is the first Executive Director of SO Clear Media Productions, Inc.
News Director
Amanda Rogers
Phoenix resident Amanda Rogers, creator of the highly acclaimed site "Operation Awareness" , is a freelance journalist and Senior Staff Writer. She has been following and researching sex offender and child safety legislation for over 15 years.
So who is Amanda Rogers? Well her real name is Jan Kruska, and she is a level one registered sex offender from Arizona.
Before she was married she was arrested in 1992 at the age of 22 in Glendale, Arizona for sexual conduct with a minor (his age-15). Her maiden name at the time of arrest was Gustafson. See the court case here: http://www.superiorcourt.maricopa.gov/docket/CriminalCourtCases/archivecaseInfo.asp?caseNumber=CR1992-004222
That was 15 years ago. Although according to Jan, she didn't get invloved in fighting the sex registry until a couple years after her arrest. She says it was in the spring of 1994 after hearing a news story about a little girl from New Jersey named, Megan Kanka. So is Thomas Lying, or did Jan lie to Thomas? Iether way, Thomas is not accurate and has not done his homework on Jan. Remember he claims that, "She has been following and researching sex offender and child safety legislation for over 15 years". NO, the truth is that she has been a registered sex offender for over 15 years.
http://www.wikisposure.com/Jan_Kruska
See this image of this screen shot here, it is written by Amanda Rogers/Jan Kruska(Gustafson) from her website, at Operation Awareness.
Also notice how at that time (in the screenshot above written only a few weeks ago), Jan/Amanda was trying to hide who she REALLY was, thus more hiding her true agenda. When Amanda Rogers was speaking of this anonymous women named, "Jane Marie Doe" it appears that she was in actuality speaking of her very own self.
She also seemed to be making a point in comparing her crime to that of the man who raped and murdered Jessica Lunsford. Like as if she was saying that what she did was not so bad. Like comparing apples and oranges fruit is fruit, a sex crime is a sex crime. Just because the direct actions differed and one may be way more heinous than the other it is still perverted & despicable either way!
However Jan/Amanda seems not feel this way.
See this screenshot for Amanda's confession that she really is Jan Kruska!
Notice how Jan says in that screenshot above that she plead guilty to the crime she committed as if she did so right away. Like she is such a wonderful citizen? Well the link I provided from the Maricopa County Superior Court Of Arizona seems to differ that claim, doesn't it?
Then she goes on to say it was ONLY a misdemeanor. She said she did not try to lie her way out of it, and it appears that she may have originally plead NOT guilty.
Then she goes on to say that Bruce Howland (see down below for more details) the other defendant aside of her was charged with a class 4 felony of child abuse, but it appears that she may have been personally summoned to court for child abuse as well.
Then she says that people are invited to go to the court and check her records for themselves, and she provided us with the case number. I have provided that court info/link she spoke of for you as mentioned above.
Then she goes on and mentions that she had JUST turned 22 when she was arrested, as if that makes a BIG difference there!
And the old claim of "THAT'S NOT MY MYSPACE ACCOUNT!" It WAS her account, if you searched her name, Jan Kruska that account popped up. If you typed in her email address, that myspace account popped up.
Myspace sends EVERYONE a confirmation/activation email for every account that gets set up. In order for that account to be activated in anyway shape or form, a link has to be followed from that email address to myspace for confirmation.
In that email it also says that if the person received that email in error what they can do to solve it. I have personally seen that myspace account with my own eyes, and I checked on it for three days in a row before she finally deleted it. In those three days it had been logged into each day.
NOTE: CT1 CHILD ABUSE CL 4 FEL (B); CTS2,3 SEXUAL CONDUCT W/MINOR CL 6 FELONIES; DR92-9781 GPD/ DOC 020792, BETWEEN 122591 - 020792
Her name at the time of the arrest was Jan Gustafson (maiden Name). Again you can see her court info here:
http://www.superiorcourt.maricopa.gov/docket/CriminalCourtCases/archivecaseInfo.asp?caseNumber=CR1992-004222
At first Jan may have plead not guilty
(6/11/1992 8:30 Original Arraignment Not Guilty)
Jan's criminal court record shows her case number is CR1992-004222-A.
The letter A at the end of that number should be followed for all of Jan's information, since there were two defendants.
The other defendant aside of Jan is BRUCE HOWLAND. His case number is the same as Jan's, however his ends with the letter B.
According to Jan, Bruce was the adopted father of the boy that Jan had sexual conduct with. Bruce was also I believe the boyfriend of Jan.
Jan claims that Bruce was an abusive alcoholic and that she cared for the boy very much. Well, I mean she was practically like his step mom right?
So Bruce would abuse her and the boy, which Jan claims made her and the boy even closer.
So how does Jan comfort a boy who is being abused by his father? She has sex with him!
It appears at that link I provided above that BOTH defendants, may have originally plead not guilty:
6/11/1992 8:30 Original Arraignment Not Guilty
Then it appears that they both went for a Not Guilty Plea Arraign On The Same Day:
6/11/1992 152 - ME: Not Guilty Plea Arraign - Party (A) 6/12/1992
6/11/1992 152 - ME: Not Guilty Plea Arraign - Party (B) 6/12/1992
Then one month afterwards looks like Jan decided to take the guilty plea bargain, changing it from not guilty to guilty:
7/10/1992 105 - ME: Plea Agreement/Change of Plea - Party (A)
7/10/1992 PAG - Plea Agreement - Party (A)
A "plea bargain" is a deal offered by a prosecutor as an incentive for a defendant to plead guilty. If every case in the justice system went to trial, the courts would be so overloaded that they would effectively be shut down. Plea bargaining allows the prosecutor to obtain guilty pleas in cases that might otherwise go to trial.
There are two types of plea bargain:
Charge Bargain
A "charge bargain" occurs when the prosecutor allows a defendant to "plead guilty to a lesser charge," or to only some of the charges that have been filed against him. For example, a defendant charged with burglary may be offered the opportunity to plead guilty to "attempted burglary." A defendant charged with Drunk Driving and Driving With License Suspended may be offered the opportunity to plead guilty to just the drunk driving charge.
Sentence Bargain
A "sentence bargain" occurs when a defendant is told in advance what his sentence will be if he pleads guilty. This can help a prosecutor obtain a conviction if, for example, a defendant is facing serious charges and is afraid of being hit with the "maximum" sentence. Typically, sentence bargains can only be granted if they are approved by the trial judge. Many jurisdictions severely limit sentence bargaining.
So what does Jan do, she considers herself to be a freelance journalist.
Amanda Rogers(Jan's "pen" name)is the alias used by Jan to discuss sex offender registries.
She can't use her real name since Jan is a registered sex offender, well she can but then who would trust her...right?
It appears that Jan hates the registry so much, that she wants to change the laws so that she does not have to be on one anymore.
Just like Thomas Madison of SOCLEAR, seems that they both feel and think this way.
They think and act as if they themselves are the victims, of course not the ones they sexually offended.
And according to Jan, the sex between her and her child victim was "consensual".
Well the boy's aunt didn't seem to agree with Jan's theory and had her arrested.
SOCLEAR is in collaboration with operation Awareness, another website dedicated to sex offenders.
And Jan is the owner and creator of Operation Awareness.
Now you have it, three scum bags with website's to help people who sexually offend other people including children!
And two of them are Registered Sex Offenders (RSO) themselves!
PLEASE VISIT THIS LINK! http://absolutezerounited.blogspot.com/2007/10/rest-of-story.html
JUST TRY AND DISPUTE THAT!
And this link too!
http://absolutezerounited.blogspot.com/2007/10/flawless-reasoning-no-more-victims-act.html
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
